Celebrities

Dean McDermott and Family | Celebrity News

Dean McDermott Not Paying Child Support?

Dean McDermott, husband of Tori Spelling and father of their four (soon to be five) children, has not been making child support payments says Mary Jo Eustace, his ex-wife and mother of their son, Jack

If you’re already not a big McDermott fan because of all that affair drama (among other things!) with Spelling, this article isn’t going to make you like him any more. Basically his ex wife is saying he’s a dead-beat dad who doesn’t keep his word nor abide by a court order. Eustace filed an order to show cause and an affidavit for contempt on January 25, 2017 in Los Angeles seeking to force McDermott to make the payments, which are to the tune of $100K.

In the document, Eustace, who was married to McDermott from 1993-2006 (that’s kind of a long time!), claimed that months ago her ex simply stopped paying child support and alimony for their now 18-year-old son, Jack. As she indicated in the court documents, “The respondent just stopped paying. He is working and lives in a $2 million dollar rental.”

In the documents, Eustace further states: “Order was entered mid September. He stopped paying in November. Also for two years prior, he did not pay and I renegotiated in good faith moving forward in our new stipulation.” Clearly Eustace, a Canadian singer/chef has had enough of this alleged non payment. She  wants the 100k in monthly installments until July 1, 2020. McDermott has been ordered to appear in court on March 9 to address these allegations. What’s interesting about an Order to Show Cause and an Affidavit for Contempt that Eustace filed is that a contempt proceeding is criminal in nature which means that if the court finds McDermott to be in contempt of a prior court order or executed agreement, penalties could include jail, a community service, and fines in addition to fulfilling the payments mandated by the underlying Order. Eustace is not playing around this time.  I am sure when she saw the images of the uber-fancy baby shower for McDermott’s fifth child with Spelling, she was glad she filed those court docs. Yes, we know the rumor mill was swirling that McDermott and Spelling’s pricey baby shower was what prompted Eustace to go to court. Sorry to burst your bubbles, Eustace filed the court docs two weeks before that luxe baby bash on February 11.

McDermott seems to have an  issue with debts-paying them that is. He and Spelling owe almost a million dollars in back taxes and have hundreds of thousands of unpaid credit card bills.  Let’s hope a judge rules soon and Eustace, and her son, can get the money they are owed. No doubt when Eustace goes to bed at night, she’s glad McDermott is not beside her.

Interested in learning more celebrity news? Please peruse PROOF. We have tons of celebrity news articles about your Hollywood favorites.

Prison for Alanis Morissette's Manager | Celebrity News | PROOF with Jill Stanley

Prison for Alanis Morissette’s Manager

Alanis Morissette’s former business manager, Jonathan Schwartz, has been busted for wire fraud and for filing false tax returns. In addition to stealing $4.7 from Alanis, Schwartz also stole $1.7 million from other clients.  Because of the seriousness of the charges against him, Schwartz faced 23 years in federal prison. But, he has entered into a plea deal with federal prosecutors in which he will serve from four to six years in prison. He’s also on the hook for $8.2 million in restitution.

Financial Adviser Ryan Wibberley

So, how did Alanis get snowed? She tried to do the right thing regarding her finances– she hired Schwartz, a financial advisor at GSO Business Management, a California company that touts itself as a premier business management firm. Even if we don’t have a lot of money, most of us are unsure of where to put our money, how to invest, how to plan for retirement so it’s especially smart for Alanis and others with high net worth to hire professionals to handle their money. The level of trust people put in their financial managers is high and when one gets ripped off by them, it really stings. Not just because hard earned money is missing but because being duped by someone we trust never feels good. What did Schwartz do with Alanis’ money? He spent $75,000.00 of it to pay off a gambling debt (nice that a financial advisor has a gambling problem. Not sure how that got past GSO). And, more than $50,000 for a lavish vacation to Bora Bora. Clearly, Alanis was not one of his travel companions.  He also invested some of it in illegal marijuana growing business. Yup, an illegal one. This guy is too much.

Lucky for Alanis (who had fired Schwartz in 2016), her new manager quickly realized Schwartz had been stealing from her. Naturally Alanis was pissed. She threatened to sue GSO for the missing money because Schwartz was acting in his capacity as a partner in the firm at the time of the theft. GSO claimed Schwartz was operating outside that scope of his job, had gone rogue, and Schwartz, not GSO, was solely responsible. GSO did act swiftly and suspended Schwartz (they are also suing him) but that’s not enough to shield them from liability. In June 2016, Alanis reached a settlement with GSO (and Schwartz) and as far as Alanis’ civil matter regarding Schwartz’s unethical behavior and GSO’s responsibility that case is closed.  And, because Schwartz has already plead guilty in the criminal and is awaiting sentencing on February 1, 2017, the criminal matter will soon be over as well. Still pending, however is GSO’s action against Schwartz. Going to be a little difficult to pursue with Schwartz behind bars. Time will tell what if any insurance coverage may come into play here (likely not much because insurance doesn’t generally kick in when there’s intentional, illegal behavior as opposed to negligence).
Alanis joins a long list of celebrities who have been taken advantage of by someone with a fiduciary responsibility to them. Ben Stiller had $250,000 ripped off by his financial advisor Dana Giachetto, Sting lost close to $10 million, Uma Thurman a million. And, As PROOF recently reported, Johnny Depp just filed a $25 million fraud lawsuit against his business managers.

Bad Celebrity Motorcycle Accidents | Keanu Reeves | celebrity news

10 of the Worst Celebrity Motorcycle Accidents

Riding a motorcycle is not a joke — if you crash on a bike, severe injury or death often occurs. Naturally, being a celebrity doesn’t make one immune from these risks. Lawsuits involving what some in the medical field refer to as donor cycles abound and though very often it is not the motorcyclist who is at fault they are the ones who suffer the most serious of injuries. Below we review 10 of the worst celebrity motorcycle crashes to date.

Lauren Hutton

Model and actress Lauren Hutton was riding with a squad, which included Dennis Hopper and Jeremy Irons, near Las Vegas for a charity ride supporting the Hermitage-Guggenheim Museum in October 2001. She went down during the ride in a crash that caused her to break both legs and arms, crushed three ribs, and punctured a lung. Maybe it was a good thing she was unconscious so she didn’t feel all the pain or notice the bone protruding from her leg.

Lucky for her and a good reason to ride with friends because that day both Hopper and Irons encouraged her to wear protective gear like leathers and a full-face helmet. Those may have saved her life but one thing is for sure, they definitely saved her famous face!

Gary Busey

Gary Busey has been known to be pretty unruly for a while now. Could it be due to a coma-inducing motorcycle accident back in 1988? Though the actor was known to be a skilled and avid rider he was also anti-helmet.  So when he went down in that accident that day, he naturally wasn’t wearing one.  He fractured his skull and sustained head injuries that required several hours of neurosurgery. Busey’s doctors said that his injuries might cause permanent brain damage. In fact, when Busey was on Celebrity Rehab in 2008, psychiatrist Dr. Charles Sophy said that the the brain injury had essentially resulted in “weakening Busey’s mental filters.” Perhaps that explains it . .  .

Peter Fonda

“Easy Rider” star Peter Fonda is a man who loves motorcycles so it’s not surprising that he has had more than one accident. In 1964, the wild man decided to wear nothing but a bathing suit and loafers for a ride on his Triumph. He hit a speed bump and went down. He suffered pretty serious injuries including bruises and broken bones but he recovered.  In 1985, he got into another wreck. This time the injuries were more severe–he broke his neck and back, causing him to lose a half inch of height after surgeries.  That didn’t stop the not-so-easy rider. In 1993, he had a head on collision with a deer, which did actually have some affect on his conduct. He says that accident stopped him riding after dark and without all his gear on. Better late than never!

Keanu Reeves

Keanu Reeves, a big fan of British motorcycles, broke his ankle while riding his bike near his Beverly Hills home back in 1996. He was on crutches for months after the crash. And, it wasn’t his first bike related accident. In 1988, Reeves, who is known as a risk taker, rode his bike on a twisting canyon road with the lights off. He crashed but didn’t suffer  injury. PROOF is very familiar with these canyon roads, especially the ones in Malibu. There are always motorcycles on them- we can definitely see the appeal but even in a car during the day these roads can sometimes be pretty intimidating.

Ben Roethlisberger

Former Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger almost died when he was involved in a his motorcycle accident near downtown Pittsburgh back in 2006. The Super Bowl champ may be a great playmaker but he wasn’t so smart that day: he was riding without a valid license (he only had a learner’s permit) and he wasn’t wearing a helmet. Big Ben took a big risk that day with his life and his career. Not that money was an issue for Roethlisberger at the time of the accident but perhaps he was smarter about insurance than he was about protective gear.

Billy Idol

In 1990, rocker Billy Idol learned that not all rules can be broken when he crashed his motorcycle into a car after he ran a stop sign in Los Angeles. His leg was mangled so badly that it almost had to be amputated. A steel rod was put in place and though he had to spend more than six months in bed after the crash, he has been seen riding since that accident.

Erik Estrada

“CHiPs” actor Erik Estrada learned how to ride a motorcycle for his famous television show and once he got the hang out of it he clearly enjoyed being a two-wheeler. But back in 1980, he had a serious crash on set. Estrada was following a camera car down an alley in Pacoima, CA, and lost control of his bike. He was thrown onto the hood of the car and his bike landed on him while 75 members of the cast and crew watched. His injuries included broken ribs and a collapsed lung. Producers wrote the crash into the storyline, filming his character’s scenes from his real-life hospital bed. And, despite the severity of the crash and his injuries, he was back on set and on a bike pretty soon!

Duane Allman

Allman Brothers rock guitarists Duane Allman died after a motorcycle accident in 1971 when swerved to avoid a truck and went down. The guitarist was riding his Harley-Davidson Sportster in Macon, GA and reportedly slowed to let a flatbed truck make a left-hand turn in front of him. Apparently, Allman swerved toward the center of the road to swing around the outside of the truck, but the truck suddenly stopped and Allman ran into it and that knocked him off his motorcycle, which bounced up in the air and off of Allman’s chest before skidding to a stop along the curb. Interestingly though Allman did not die instantly; he died later that day in surgery.

David Hasselhoff

The former “Baywatch” star crashed his motorcycle in Los Angeles in 2003, resulting in not-so serious in injuries to him but very serious injuries to his passenger, his then-wife Pamela Bach,. Hasselhoff told investigating officers that he and his wife were riding his 2003 Harley-Davidson near a freeway overpass when a gust of wind forced him to lose control of the bike, which made him run into a curb, throwing the couple. It should be noted that Pamela Bach sites that accident as the turning point in her marriage when she felt she could no longer cover up her husband’s problem with alcohol. Lucky for her she can’t remember anything about the crash (or if Hasselhoff was drunk at the time) except waking up in hospital. Pamela remained in hospital for two months, had 17 operations which has left her with two steel rods and 27 screws in her left leg. FYI, the couple has been divorced since 2006.

Ann-Margaret

Ann-Margaret is a long time motorcycle lover. She was thrown from her motorcycle in Brainerd, Minnesota in August of 2000. She suffered three broken ribs and a fractured left shoulder but amazingly enough, the next day, the “Bye, Bye Birdie” star managed to still appear as the Grand Marshal of the Colonel’s Truck Accessories National Hot Rod Association Nationals, riding in a pace car with her left arm in a sling. The show must goes on, I guess!

Lots of morals to motorcycle accident stories but the biggest one–wear protective gear!

Mel Gibson Pays Robert Downey Jr's Insurance | Celeb News | PROOF with Jill Stanley

Are You Ready to Be a Mel Gibson Fan Again? This Might Just Convince You

If Hacksaw Ridge isn’t enough to convince you to be a Mel Gibson fan again, learning about this very cool thing he did for an A-lister just might! As many know, Mel Gibson struggled with an alcohol addiction. And, it was an alcohol related arrest that lead to the incident involving the anti-semitic rant that had many of us enraged, let down and no longer supportive of Gibson. We also know that since that arrest Gibson has apologized to the Jewish community and that he has tried to make amends. Now, 10 years later, he seems to finally be finding his way back into Hollywood’s better, if not good, graces. His film, Hacksaw Ridge, has been nominated for a Golden Globe. But there is a little-known story about him that may also help change what some think of him.

It’s the story of how he helped out fellow troubled celeb, Robert Downey Jr. After Downey’s repeated run-ins with the law due to his addiction issues, Hollywood was afraid to work with him; no insurance company would insure him. They were all worried that Downey would relapse, that he would fail to show up for work or be unable to learn his lines. Basically, they no longer believed Downey could do his job. If Downey did in fact fail, the cost to the production and the insurance company would be high. In the insurance terms, Downey was worse than a sixteen year old male driving a Porsche—he was simply too high a risk. So what did Gibson do? He underwrote insurance coverage for Downey. This means that if Downey did, in fact, fail to do his job and an insurance claim was triggered, Mel would have to pay for the loss. I don’t know about you but this act of kindness and assumption of personal risk deserves some recognition. And, more, Gibson’s actions shows empathy. Not a bad trait to have.

**One more little note about these two: both have received acts of clemency, integral parts of the American justice system. Downey received a criminal pardon from Governor Jerry Brown of California in 2015 for his conviction and in 2009 a Malibu judge dismissed/expunged Gibson’s 2006 drunk driving conviction from his record. I’d say it’s probably time for all of us to move on.

Celebrity News | Chris Brown Legal Problems

Repeat Offenders: 3 Celebs Who Just Can’t Seem to Stay Out of Trouble

Some celebrities just can’t seem to stay out of legal trouble. Why, when they arguably have it all—money, power, fame—would they risk it all? Is it because as celebrities they are now so controlled that they can’t make a move without a manager, an agent or a publicist saying it’s okay? Are these bad choices their way of acting out or rebelling? Or is it due to some addiction—drug, sex or otherwise? Or, is it because the power makes them feel invincible? Could be any one of these things or combination. Let’s look at the top 3 offenders and see in which category they fall.

Chris Brown

August 2016 and Chris Brown is back in the news. He was arrested in his home in Tarzana, CA, charged with assault with a deadly weapon (California Penal Code  245), and released on $250,000 bail.  Now, truthfully the story is a little fishy. The victim doesn’t have the cleanest hands or background and seemingly jumped at every television interview she could the day of the alleged crime. But, unfortunately for Brown, a search warrant for his home was issued and guns and drugs were uncovered in a duffle bag right outside. So, even if it turns out he did not hold a gun to the victim and threaten her, there is still the possibility he will be charged with other violations. At the time of this writing we do not know the types of drugs recovered or who owned the gun, but as a convicted felon resulting from his assault on Rihanna, Chris is not supposed to be in possession of a firearm.  Perhaps the weapons belonged to one of his houseguests, and maybe the drugs too.  That would be good for Chris who posted ranting, aggressive and at times rambling Instagram videos while he holed up in house hours after the alleged incident while waiting for LAPD to return with a search warrant. This one is going to be interesting to monitor! True to our title, Chris Brown has had many a run-in with the law in between his assault on Rihanna in February 2009, for which he plead guilty and this August 2016 situation. There’s, the 2012 fight with Drake’s crew, then the assault on Frank Ocean, a hit and run and then another assault arrest after he grew angry with fans who tried to take a picture with him. A May 2014 arrest for a probation violation. Then there were the allegations levied against him in January 2016 for an alleged assault in Vegas (those charges were dropped). He has also faced legal complaints from his neighbors who say Chris and his friends ride ATVs recklessly on the street and damage their lawns. This is simply too much for one 27 year old musician. One thing is for sure though, Chris Brown needs help and a support system that can truly be there for him.

Lindsay Lohan

Like Chris Brown, Lindsay Lohan was back in the news in August 2016 but not for committing a crime; rather she was the victim of alleged domestic violence at the hands of her fiancée, Egor Tarabasov. So far no charges have been filed. Lohan has been in the spotlight since she was a young actress but as she entered her teens she became better known for her legal missteps than her acting chops. In 2007, Lohan was arrested twice, both times for DUI.  As a result, she was sentenced to one day in jail, community service, drug treatment programs for her addiction to cocaine, and 3 years of probation. Two years later though in October 2009, after failing to complete all the mandated programs, a year was added on to her probation. In June 2010 she was arrested after she violated a court order mandating that she not consume alcohol while wearing an ankle bracelet; she was sentenced to 90 days in jail. Lucky Lindsay only had to stay for two weeks. In September 2010, she failed a drug test, spent another day in jail, and went back to rehab for three months.  For a short while after that,  Lindsay was seemingly doing okay. But, not for long. In February 2011 she was charged with that somewhat infamous burglary involving a necklace from a Venice jewelry store.  She was sentenced to 120 days in jail and community service but due to overcrowding she served her sentence under house arrest. All that luck and you’d think Lindsay would make better choices. But, Lindsay once again failed to complete her community service and was sent back to jail. Luck was still with her and after a few hours she was released again due to overcrowding. This is when you truly begin to wonder—is this luck or do celebrities get special treatment? Looking at Lindsay’s laundry list it’s hard to say they don’t. On a good note, Lindsay has remained pretty much crime-free for the last few years albeit not without drama as is pretty evident by the events of August 2016.

Charlie Sheen

Charlie Sheen, troubled, rich kid from Malibu, son of famed Hollywood actor, Martin Sheen has spent a large part of his adult life entangled with the law. Generally for involving the same two things: assaults and drugs. Back in 1996, he charged with  assaulting a former girlfriend. In 1998, he nearly overdosed on cocaine. Then, in 2006, during his divorce from Denise Richards, there were claims that he physically and verbally abused her, even threatened to kill her. And, in December 2009, he was arrested on suspicion of second-degree assault of Denise Richards. He has months in and out of rehab and has also participated in domestic violence counseling.  Despite all of that, he was subsequently found naked and drunk in a New York hotel. In 2014, a Los Angeles dental technician sued him for assault and battery.  Though he didn’t deny his conduct and blamed in on gas the dentist’s office  administered, she ultimately dropped the case.  What is clear though is that Charlie Sheen has had drug and anger problem that prevent him from making the best choices and even a supportive family and a lot of rehab have not really helped this Hollywood bad boy stay clean and out of trouble. Now that he is in his 50s maybe age will slow him down, provide him with some clarity and help him walk the straight and narrow.

Alexander Pope said, “to err is human.” Yes, celebs are human but it is troubling that people in their position to be role models, to do the right thing take such risks with their lives as well as those of others. And whether the repeat behavior is due to the pressure of the spotlight, youth, vast wealth, or delusions of superiority, one thing is for sure, these repeat offenders need help. At Proof we urge them to get some—for everybody’s sake.

Selling An Oscar Award | Celebrity News

Selling an Oscar? We’ll Give You $1.00 Says the Academy

Ever wonder what happens if an Oscar winner decides she doesn’t want her award anymore? Maybe it’s just taking up space on her mantle or in her bathroom (where Juliette Binoche keeps hers) or a sock drawer (Anna Paquin’s hiding place).  Or maybe, that winner has passed away and her heirs have bills to pay and want to sell it (or melt it down!). Or maybe, the actor just needs some extra cash? Toss that thing up on EBay or let a high-end auction house like Sothebys sell it? Guaranteed to yield big bucks, right? Well, no, actually.  Because since 1951 Oscar winners and their heirs, are prohibited from selling the gold statuette without first offering to sell it back to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (prior to 1951 there was no such rule).

At first blush, this may sound okay. The Academy must have a lot of money.  They put on that fancy, seemingly never-ending show each year. Surely they know better than anyone else the value of an Oscar. Easy. Let them buy it.  Well, again, that’s a no, assuming the winner wants to make some money on the sale. You see, in the fine print of the Academy’s regulations, there’s the following language: “Award winners shall not sell or otherwise dispose of the Oscar statuette, nor permit it to be sold or disposed of by operation of law, without first offering to sell it to the Academy for the sum of $1.00. This provision shall apply also to the heirs and assigns of Academy Award winners who may acquire a statuette by gift or bequest.” So that’s what a winner gets if she sells her Oscar to the Academy—one dollar (it used to be $10.00 but they lowered it!).  And each winner must sign the Academy’s regulations. If she refuses to sign, then no Oscar.  As you can imagine, so far no one has refused to sign but it’s also probably fair to say that very few have read the fine print!

Despite these strict rules, reportedly up to 150 Oscars have been sold. Industry experts estimate that the prices have ranged from $60,000 to $1.5 million. Many that have been sold were Oscars awarded post the 1951 ban.  The Academy is not sitting idly by and letting this happen.   They are bringing lawsuits, seeking punitive and compensatory damages as well as demanding the return of the statue. So far, courts seems to be on their side.  In 2015 an LA court showed support for the Academy’s position and denied a motion for summary judgment in the legal battle waging between the Academy and heirs of Joseph Wright who won an Oscar for best color and art direction in the 1942 film My Gal Sal.  This Oscar was clearly won before the 1951 rule was enacted so, among other things, Wright’s heirs argued it could be sold. But, because Wright was a member of the Academy until his death in 1985, the Academy contended the Oscar must be offered back to them.  And the judge agreed.  According to Judge Feuer, the LA County Superior Court judge who decided the matter, she was not applying the law retroactively to Wright but rather it was that his membership in the Academy was predicated on his agreement to the new right of first refusal in its bylaws.  She further pointed out that “As of 1951, Wright was free to leave the Academy and sell his Oscar on the free market, but instead decided to retain his membership subject to the new bylaws.” If you’d like to read Judge Feuer judgment that all parties stipulated (agreed) to, please click here.

Though so far the court has agreed, not all legal experts do. Some question the legal enforceability of the Academy’s regulations and others argue that because Oscar statues are considered the property of the winner, winners should be able to do what they wish with it. Make sense, right? The winner put in the hard work, rightfully won the award, why should they have any restrictions?

The Academy has a convincing counter argument. Dawn Hudson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Academy since 2011, has said that the Academy never intended the Oscar to be treated as an article of trade, and making it so diminishes its value and that it should remain as recognition of creative effort not for commercial purposes. Hollywood big wigs seem to agree with Ms. Hudson.  Steven Spielberg, himself an Oscar winner, bought Bette Davis’ 1938 Best Actress Oscar for Jezebel for $578,000 and returned it to the Academy (he has bought others and returned them as well).  If you’re following the argument, he was allowed to legally buy this Oscar because it was prior to the 1951 rule but because he has been a member of the Academy after 1951 he was bound by the rule (more likely though he returned it because he agrees with their position about recognition of creative efforts). Kevin Spacey did the same with George Stoll’s 1945 Oscar for Anchors Aweigh for which he paid $157,000.

I applaud what these A-listers are doing  and I understand the Academy’s position—I’m just not so sure I agree with it, from a legal standpoint.

Want more stories to feed your celebrity news fix? Check out what PROOF has to say about celebrity divorce, celebrity arrests, and other breaking celebrity news.

Eva Longoria's Restaurant Sued | Celeb News | Proof with Jill Stanley

Eva Longoria’s Restaurant, Beso, Sued…Again!

In 2008, entrepreneur/actress Eva Longoria opened Beso, a Latin restaurant located in the heart of Hollywood. Naturally, at the outset it was packed with big celebs such as Brad Pitt, Courtney Cox, and Ryan Seacrest. It was quite a hot spot. It also garnered and continues to garner solid reviews on Yelp, Open Table and Trip Advisor. So, what’s with all the lawsuits? Well, thankfully none of them are for food poisoning. But, not so sure Hollywood elite are going to return there instead of heading straight for Catch, arguably the hottest hot spot of late 2016 and likely 2017!

The most recent suit against Beso, filed on December 20, 2016, is for injury and premises liability and seeks damages in excess of $25,000. Premises liability is a legal term and pretty self explanatory: an injury occurs on someone’s property. In order to win a premises liability case in California the injured party (plaintiff) must prove that the defendant owned, occupied, leased or controlled the property, was negligent in the use or maintenance of the property, the plaintiff was harmed and that defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing that harm. In this case, Paul Michael Flores claims that he was struck several times while at Beso, by a Beso employee. Further complicating things for Beso is that the incident occurred during an after party for one of Longoria’s movie, Lowriders; and Flores alleges that violence that night was foreseeable because of actors from East LA gangs were present at the party and Beso knew they would be present. This is not good news for Longoria. Would have been better had a random patron on a random night struck Flores. I’ll keep an eye on this lawsuit but settlement likely assuming Flores’ injuries are real and the evidence supports his claims.

As for Beso’s other lawsuits? The 2010 and 2013 lawsuits also claimed premises liability and injuries one involving a physical altercation and another involving a slip and fall. Those suits were ultimately both resolved and dismissed. In 2011, Beso was hit with another slip and fall lawsuit that has also been resolved. (There’s another 2011 suit that is contract based and named Eva Longoria individually as a defendant but that relates to her failed Las Vegas location under the same name.)

So, whether Longoria and her team (which includes celebrity chef Todd English) can keep fighting these lawsuits and still run a successful establishment in a town overflowing with restaurants and clubs remains to be seen but certainly all this violence is not helping.

Mel Gibson

Mel Gibson is Staging His Comeback Years After Case Involving Anti-Semitic Rant Was Dismissed

The conviction connected with the anti-Semitic rant heard ‘round the world is off the record books. In fact, it has been for quite some time—since 2009. How is that most of us don’t know that? Well, it’s due to the perfectly legal concept of expungement (and a little bit because of the First Amendment). Let’s go back to 2006 when it all went down.  

Mel had a little too much to drink on July 28, 2006 (At the time, Mel was a self-pronounced, long-suffering alcoholic) at a popular bar on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu. Nevertheless, he got into the driver’s seat of his Lexus and proceeded to speed down the PCH doing 85 in a 45. I am very familiar with this stretch of road and I can tell you that he put his life, and the lives of others, in danger that night.

Once the officer pulled Mel over, it was very obvious that Mel was drunk.  The officer had Mel perform field sobriety tests and when he advised him that he was detaining him for suspicion of drunk driving that’s when all hell broke loose. Mel refused to get in the cop car, tried to run back to his own car, touted his celebrity status and “who he was”, and launched into the infamous anti-Semitic tirade that we all seem not to be able to forget. Mel was ultimately charged with misdemeanor drunk driving, driving with an elevated blood-alcohol level (his was .12 the legal limit in CA is .08) and driving with an open container of alcohol in his car (a bottle of tequila was found in the Lexus). Mel never appeared in court on the matter.  His lawyer brokered a deal, and, on Mel’s behalf, entered a plea of no contest to driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.08 percent or higher; the other charges were dropped as part of the deal. Just so my PROOF readers are clear, in California, no contest is not an admission of guilt but is equivalent to a guilty plea for the purposes of sentencing. It is not an uncommon plea in situations involving the types of charges levied against Mel Gibson.

As for his nolo plea (that’s fancy legal talk for a no contest plea which comes from the Latin phrase nolo contendere), Mel was sentenced to three years probation with a requirement that he spend the next year in a 12-step program for alcoholism, pay more than $1,600 in fines and fees, restriction of his driver’s license for 90 days, and to undergo a state-mandated alcohol abuse education program for three months.

In 2009, that conviction was expunged or dismissed, as it is called in California.  In plain language this means that the conviction is off of Mel’s record; it’s as if it never happened (though it is visible to law enforcement and can be considered should he have a subsequent arrest). Well, why is that? Did he get special treatment because he’s a celebrity (On a related note, some believe Mel got special treatment during the arrest but an investigation found that procedures were properly followed)? No, as for the dismissal, Mel did not receive special treatment. But before, I explain why he didn’t get special celeb treatment, let’s discuss briefly the concept of expungement.  Expungement is an essential part of our criminal justice system. There are many reasons why someone would seek to have a conviction expunged. Those reasons range from the inability to rent an apartment or an office, the inability to get a job, and today’s world, it might even mean the inability to get a date. Landlords and employers routinely do criminal background checks on potential tenants and candidates and, with such easy access to criminal records via the internet potential dates are now doing the same for potential mates!  So rather than have to live with the stigma of a conviction and/or have to explain sensitive situations from one’s past, if one meets the eligibility requirements, an expungement can be very helpful.

Expungement eligibility varies by state but the requirements are generally similar and by analyzing Mel’s dismissal we can learn how the convictions of others might be handled.  Here’s what the judge in 2009 considered when dismissing Mel’s case:

  1. Mel was convicted of a misdemeanor
  2. Mel was not sentenced to time in prison
  3. Mel satisfied all the requirement of his punishment
  4. Mel had not gotten into any other legal trouble ( He was arrested 2 years later though!)
  5. More than a year had passed since Mel’s conviction

Thankfully no one was physically injured as a result of Mel’s drunk driving. The most heinous part of Mel’s arrest, to most of us, is those terrible, hateful comments that spewed from his mouth that night.  And for those who believe alcohol is a truth serum it is very hard to forgot what he said or believe that he did not mean what he said despite his apologies.  But, Mel did not violate any laws by saying what he said. The First Amendment, protects his words no matter how odious or hurtful and so you will notice that Mel’s comments are not part of the dismissal discussion. Quite simply, they play no role in the expungement analysis. No matter how bothered some may still be by his comments, the judge’s actions in not considering them in his dismissal determination, was proper.  As for whether you forgive or dismiss from your mind Mel’s arrest, well, that’s solely for you to decide.

Celebrity Agent Contracts | Celebrity News | PROOF with Jill Stanley

These Are the 3 Most Important Clauses in Celebrity Agent Contracts

By the time someone achieves “celebrity status” they have an agent, a top agent, most likely. All aspects of that talent and agent relationship are carefully spelled out in a very detailed contract. Though these types of representation agreements vary (and of course the bigger the celeb the more negotiating power he or she has with the agent and vice versa) much of the information there are standard clauses which appear in every contract.

Also, the bigger celebrity, the bigger the entourage and I’m not referring to a posse with whom the celeb goes to the clubs, I am talking about a business entourage-personal managers, talent agents, talent attorneys, publicists, social media managers, etc. True there are a small handful of celebs who run their own business (i.e. Judge Judy. But she is such a smart, dialed in woman, she doesn’t need anyone!) but even they seek advice and counsel. Most celebrities, again this depends on personal choice and the degree of celebrity, may have one or two representatives who fulfill several roles. Regardless of how many there are on a celebrity’s payroll, contracts are the name of the game-this is where mutual rights and duties are spelled out. Hence, they are the key to any Hollywood relationship. Here are three of the most important clauses found find in celebrity agent contract:

  1. Term. This is the length of the contract between the celebrity and the agent. Most representation agreements last between one and five years. One year is not unusual for a first-time contract and is quite beneficial to both sides. If one or both don’t make money from the other, tif the personalities and work styles clash, will want to move on after the first year.
  2. Commission. This clause details the percentage of their income the celebrity will pay the agent. The commission rate is negotiable but it’s usually ten percent, but not higher. According to SAG-AFTRA (the actors union), “No franchised agent may charge a rate of commission higher than 10%.” Naturally if you are working with a non franchised agent or are not in SAG-AFTRA this rule will not apply. However, every celebrity is a member of SAG. It is only new actors or those who aren’t seeking to do the high budget union projects that are not members of SAG-AFTRA.
  3. Coverage. The celebrity may come to the agent-client relationship with projects that pre-dated the the agent and for which the agent had zero involvement but have not yet been produced. So that the agent does not receive commissions on those jobs, a coverage clause will delineate those jobs that are excluded. A coverage clause will also detail areas of employment that the agent will handle such as garnering work for the actor in commercials, television, film, theater, speaking engagements, or reality tv. For example, if the celebrity is a reality TV star but wants the agent to try to secure him/her film roles, the coverage clause may state that the agent is excluded from commissions on anything but film roles. Coverage clauses are sometimes called “carve-outs” because, as you can see, they carve out areas where the agent cannot earn commission.

In the ruthless world of Hollywood, written, iron-clad contracts are important for all parties. Even with contracts drafted and reviewed again and again by high-dollar celebrity lawyers, lawsuits still get filed, by both talent and agents.

Darius McCrary in domestic violence dispute | celebrity news | PROOF with Jill Stanley

Actor Darius McCrary is Facing Some Serious Family Matters

Darius McCrary, you may remember his as “Eddie” from “Family Matters,” and his estranged wife, Tammy Brawner, are embroiled in a bitter domestic violence dispute with both sides claiming violence against the other.

In shocking allegations, Brawner asked for a restraining order against her McCrary on February 10, 2017 claiming that the one-time sitcom star held their one-year-old daughter, Zoey, over a pot of boiling water and saying he wished she had never been born. She says he threw objects at her (Brawner) that almost hit Zoey. Brawner claimed that the actor has been abusive for years, coming home drunk and on drugs, and striking her during violent outbursts.

After hearing the claims, a judge granted Brawner, who was once a Harlem Globetrotter, a restraining order.  McCrary didn’t let things end there. He made several digs about his ex on social media calling her a “failed gold digger baller” but in a very interesting turn of events, he sought a restraining order against Brawner saying that she’s  the one who is abusive to him. Among his claims? She threw an iron at him.  A judge granted McCrary’s request for a temporary restraining order. Now they both have one! Not easy to parent when dual orders are in place!

By the way, this isn’t McCrary’s first family related claim.  A prior ex, Karrine Steffans, accused McCrary of domestic violence and child abuse. Steffans said that she saw McCrary beat his son with a spoon.  McCrary has also been arrested for failing to pay child support.

This is one very complex family matter! Let’s hope Zoey, the couple’s daughter, is spared as much as possible and can grow up in a healthy, loving, nonviolent home.

Top Criminal Lawyer Elizabeth New Jersey | Teresa Guidice Mug Shot | Celebrity Criminal News | PROOF with Jill stanley

Teresa and Joe Giudice Thought They Were Above the Law

Teresa and Joe Giudice of Real Housewives of New Jersey notoriety (notice I don’t say fame) bragged constantly on air and social media about their family, their money and their material possessions. To many, they were brash, rude and offensive so in 2013 when they faced a federal multi-count indictment detailing white collar crimes ranging from conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud and bank fraud to making false statements on loan applications, to bankruptcy fraud, among other things, there was not a great deal of empathy for the showy duo. (Note that Joe faced additional charges for failing to file tax returns from 2004-2008.)

Teresa and Joe pleaded not guilty to the charges in the federal indictment and so solid (delusional?) was Teresa’s belief in her innocence that her lawyer stated that they were looking forward to vindication. As we all well know, that vindication was not to come because on March 4, 2014, Teresa and Joe struck a plea deal with prosecutors. They each pleaded guilty to various counts of fraud; Joe’s plea included a count for failing to file tax returns.

Borneo_testimonial2

On October 2, 2014, the mother of four was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison.  Joe was sentenced to 41 months, followed by possible deportation to Italy, where he was born (his parents moved him to the Garden State when he was a year old). In addition the couple was ordered to pay $414,000 in restitution.

From the bench, U.S. District Court Judge Esther Salas, who presided over the case, said to Teresa, “For a moment I thought about probation but I think a period of confinement is absolutely necessary in this case.” The judge added, “I don’t honestly believe that you understand or respect the law. I need to send a message. In the eyes of the law, it doesn’t matter who you are. There are consequences to pay.”

And pay they have … Teresa went off first and began her sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut on January 5, 2015. She was released two months early on the morning of December 23, 2015. Respected Elizabeth New Jersey criminal lawyer, Michael Borneo, said the following about Teresa’s sentence: “Judges typically have tremendous discretion when sentencing a criminal defendant. It amazes me how often clients show disrespect to the court and learn this lesson the hard way. By all accounts, Teresa Giudice could have avoided prison. Her poor attitude tilted the scales of justice against her.”

Joe is a different story and is currently serving his 41-month sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fort Dix, New Jersey. Note that this matter isn’t Joe’s first run-in with the law nor his first criminal conviction. In November 2013, he stood trial on charges that in 2010 he used his brother’s marriage and birth certificates to illegally obtain a driver’s license. Joe’s license had been suspended as a result of a DUI earlier that year and apparently he thought this was a good way to get a new one! All that waiting around at DMV for nothing.  Joe was convicted, his license was revoked for 12 months, and he was sentenced to 20 days of community service.

Many of us had hoped that being convicted of a crime, publicly humiliated, and shipped off to prison forcing her to be away from her beloved daughters (despite her many shortcomings it is obvious that Teresa is committed to her family and loves her girls very much) would have changed Teresa but it appears it did not. Teresa maintains her innocence and ignorance about the charges levied against her. She still posts pictures of herself and her girls on Instagram which depict a lavish style–one of fancy clothes, jewelry, and just plain over abundance. Prison may be a reality check for many but not for this Jersey reality queen.

I do give great credit to Judge Salas for allowing Joe and Teresa to serve their sentences at different times so that one parent could be home with the children while the other was “locked up”. The kids didn’t ask for this drama in their lives and having both parents gone at the same time would have been very traumatic for them.

If you enjoyed reading about the criminal mess these New Jersey “celebs” created for themselves, please visit the rest of PROOF for more of our one of a kind take on celebrity news.

Delta2

Top Criminal Lawyer Elizabeth NJ

[Category: Teresa Giudice | New Jersey | Top Criminal Lawyer Elizabeth NJ]

Mariah Carey New Year's Eve Meltdown | Celeb Legal Gossip | PROOF with Jill Stanley

There Could Be Legal Ramifications in the Mariah Carey New Year’s Eve Debacle

Depending on the language of the contract, Mariah could sue Dick Clark Productions for breach of contract for failing to provide what she needed or even reasonably expected in order for her to perform properly thus causing her to suffer damage to her reputation. On the flip side, Dick Clark Productions may also have a breach of contract claim because Mariah, being a very experienced singer, should have been able to work through the “technical glitches” in a more professional way and one in which fulfilled the requirements mandated by the contract.

The finger pointing has already begun with Mariah’s camp saying Dick Clark Productions engaged in acts of sabotage against her and Dick Clark Productions camp saying it was Mariah’s decision not to do a sound check herself, and, the sound was just fine — ear piece or not.

With more than 2 million people in Times Square on New Year’s Eve, millions more watching at home, and the millions Mariah likely received for her performance, there’s a lot at stake here. But how about a shout out for the dancers? They seemed to handle it all in stride!

Mark Wahlberg Isn’t About to Get a Pardon, But Check Out the Celeb Who Did

Pardon, the governmental act that bestows official forgiveness upon someone convicted of a crime is an important aspect of the American justice system. Getting a pardon doesn’t mean one is innocent or that the crime did not occur; but it does mean one can get some rights back, such as the right to vote, sit on a jury or hold office (I know what some of you are thinking, who cares about any of that? I would love an excuse to get out of jury duty!).  But, to the convicted felon a pardon is important and often has more to do with actually feeling forgiven and reducing the stigma associated with being a convict than anything else.

Mark Wahlberg comes to mind for many of us when we think of celebrities and pardons.  And there’s good reason for that. In November 2014, he petitioned the governor of Massachusetts for a pardon for his 1988 convictions for criminal contempt, assault and battery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, and possession of a class D controlled substance.  He was not yet 17 at the time of the convictions but was treated as an adult in the eyes of the law. He was sentenced to 2 years in prison (He only served 45 days; the rest was suspended). After being released he went on to become a pretty well known rapper—Marky Mark.  You would have thought he would have learned his lesson but, no, in 1992, he had another fight. This time he fractured someone’s jaw. Ultimately, Wahlberg did not face criminal charges for that incident but rather settled the matter in the civil arena. Putting those two violent incidents aside as well all the other issues that defined his very troubled youth, such as extensive drug use and hurling racial epithets at young African American children, since the 1992 assault, Wahlberg has lived a clean and honest life.  As we all know, he is an actor, a producer, an entrepreneur and an active and involved philanthropist. He is the long time husband of Rhea Durham, has 4 daughters and got his GED in 2013 ( I am particularly impressed by this achievement. Certainly there was no reason other than personal growth and self improvement for this step. No doubt, Lone Survivor, Ted 2 and Entourage would have done well without Wahlberg having earned his GED).

All of his good deeds and work to better his life and and the lives of others is carefully laid out in his pardon petition which you can read here. insert petition. Take a look, it’s a good read and provides rare insight into the life of a well known celebrity.  And, as far as pardon petitions go, Wahlberg’s is solid. Persuasive. He really has changed, it seems.  And, you know what? Wahlberg did have a very difficult  early life. He was the youngest of 9 children, and, as noted above was doing drugs by age 13 and had constant run-ins with the law. Basically, nobody was watching this kid, holding him accountable, teaching him right from wrong. Does that excuse his crimes? No. Does that mean he wasn’t responsible for calling African-American kids in the neighborhood the “N-word”, chasing them on his bike and throwing rocks at them? Hell no, it doesn’t. But it does provide some context for his life and shows just how far he has come from those early days.

So, given that Wahlberg has a good, true story to tell, one that ticks off all the boxes required for the granting of a pardon, why did he not get one? That answer is more involved than one would think. The main, legal reason? Well, basically he withdrew his petition (The Parole Board sent him letters asking if wanted to keep it open but Wahlberg never responded) so there was nothing for an official to act on. The story behind that? Only Wahlberg knows the answer but it’s pretty easy to figure out.

Here’s my take:

Though the victim of his most violent act (from which the 1988 convictions stemmed), Hoa Trinh, was in favor of Wahlberg being granted a pardon many back in the old neighborhood were not. In fact, over 15,500 people signed an18MR.org (a website that  seeks to promote Asian and Pacific Islanders civic engagement, influence, and movement by leveraging the power of technology and social media) petition entitled “Don’t Pardon Mark Wahlberg’s Hate Crime Conviction.” And, over 2,500 people signed a separate petition on MoveOn.org that sought to have Wahlberg withdraw his for pardon or declined due to the violent and racially inflammatory aspects of his criminal acts. Also, once Wahlberg filed the petition, the ugly details of his troubled youth and his hateful and hate-filled behavior started appearing in both local and national media. You see, Wahlberg calling those children the “N-word” wasn’t an isolated act of hate; the 1988 crime wasn’t just a fight. Wahlberg referred to the first victim, Thanh Lam as a “Vietnam fucking shit” and as he was fleeing from Thanh and ran up to Hoa Trinh, the second victim, he put his arm around him and mockingly said: “Police coming, police coming, let me hide.”  And while in custody for hitting Thanh with a stick and punching Trinh in the eye, Wahlberg is alleged to have made numerous unsolicited racial statements about “gooks” and “slant-eyed gooks.” And those African-America children he taunted and chased while they were on a school trip? At least one of them, Kristyn Atwood, now 40 years old spoke out against Wahlberg getting a pardon “I don’t really care who he is. It doesn’t make him any exception. If you’re a racist, you’re always going to be a racist. And for him to want to erase it I just think it’s wrong,” she told The Associated Press after learning of Wahlberg’s request.  Atwood maintains that though she wasn’t seriously injured when Wahlberg threw a rock at her then fourth grade self, the incident left a lasting impression. No doubt, Kristyn. I understand that fully.

So, imagine Mark Wahlberg having spent almost 25 years trying to do the right thing, paying his debt to society on a pretty impressive scale and then when he seeks to have that change officially recognized is hammered with bad press. All the negative, immoral, criminal behavior dredged up for everyone to analyze again and again as if it just happened. I think he said to himself: No, thanks. My family, my loved ones, my god (Wahlberg is known to be a devout Catholic) knows who I am and that’s enough for me. And in the words of Cee-Lo Green said “forget you”. And so that’s it. No pardon for Mark Wahlberg.

One celebrity who was granted a pardon is Robert Downey Jr. In 2015, Governor Jerry Brown in his traditional Christmas Eve pardon announcements, included one for Downey in connection with his drug convictions from the 1990s.  Back then, Downey was a bit of a mainstay in the California court system. But when he was stopped for speeding on the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and cops found cocaine, heroin, and a weapon in his car, Downey could no longer avoid incarceration. He was sentenced to prison for violating probation for a prior drug offense. Many may remember that in court the day of the sentencing, Downey made an emotional plea begging the Malibu judge not to send him to state prison and allow him to go to rehab yet again. The judge was not having it. He sentenced Downey to 3 years (he did get credit for his 200 days in county jail), and basically told Downey that he was manipulative, had exhausted not only the court’s patience but all options for drug rehab. So, off Downey went.  There’s an excellent Vanity Fair article that details Downey’s life in prison if you want to learn what his day to day life was like on the inside—this was no country club. But, upon release, Downey committed to living a drug-free, law-abiding life and apparently even one day while again on PCH, pulled over (without police involvement!) and tossed all of his drugs into the Pacific Ocean.  From then on, he fought his demons, got clean and was rewarded for it.  Well done, Ironman.  You got help, fixed your life, and received the recognition you deserve and I don’t mean by only from the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences.  I love a happy ending.

MIscha Barton sex tape | celebrity news

A Small Victory for Mischa Barton in Revenge Porn Case

Victory for Mischa Barton who has received a restraining order against two ex boyfriends, Jon Zacharias and Adam Shaw, two lovely fellows who not only filmed her without her consent or knowledge but also have been shopping around a sex tape of her without her consent or knowledge. The 31-year-old alleges that the tapes were made with hidden cameras.

The court has ordered her ex boyfriends to stay an undisclosed distance away from her and not contact her. The order also stops anyone who is considering trafficking the video.

It has been a rough couple of weeks for the former “O.C.” star. She was recently hospitalized for a mental evaluation and now this “revenge porn” situation.

In an emotional press conference, Barton’s lawyer, Lisa Bloom  (daughter of PROOF favorite and famed civil rights lawyer, Gloria Allred), stated that YouPorn, RedTube and Porn.com were all considering making offers on the video which features the actress in sexually explicit situations with a man she briefly dated.  The tapes have been shopped around for an asking price of $500,000.

Bloom emphasized a specific portion of the court’s ruling: This individual and his agents may not sell, distribute, give away, or show any naked pictures or video of any type of Mischa Barton. The orders are very clear about what happens to violators, whether those are agents shopping the images or the men who took them– failure to obey the court order can result in jail or prison.

We at PROOF are especially inspired by Bloom’s creative and intelligent argument that because Mischa dated the man, release of the tapes is a form of domestic abuse and Mischa is therefore protected by California’s domestic violence laws.

Barton also spoke at the press conference, saying, “This is a painful situation and my absolute worst fear was realised when I learned that someone I loved and trusted was filming my most intimate and private moments, without my consent with hidden cameras.”

We applaud Mischa, Lisa Bloom and the court for taking this situation seriously. And, we know we say this all the time here on PROOF about being a celebrity but really think about Mischa’s words at that press conference and then imagine that someone you loved and trusted betrayed you, used you in this way. Surely fame is not worth that. Stay healthy and keep fighting, Mischa. We, like your lawyer and the court, are on your side!

Seeking more celebrity news? Check out other PROOF articles.  We cover celebrity news like no one else!

Celebrity News

It Looks Like the Scarlett Johansson and Romain Dauriac Divorce Will Be a Messy One

We are HUGE Scarlett Johansson fans here are PROOF so we are sad that is has been confirmed that her marriage is over. And sadder still that things look like they might get pretty messy.

Scarlett Johansson filed for divorce from her husband, Romain Dauriac, a French journalist- turned-popcorn seller (Just a few months ago he and Johansson opened Yummy Pop, a gourmet popcorn shop in Paris.) on March 7, 2017 after only two years of marriage. In January we had heard rumblings that the couple had broken up but all seemed quiet there for a while. Johansson, no dummy, thankfully did have a prenup with Dauriac so the majority of the financial issues are resolved. The biggest issue in the breakup is going to be over custody of their 2-year-old daughter, Rose Dorothy. Johansson has asked for primary physical custody. According to his lawyer, Dauriac is going to fight that.  

Both Dauriac and Johansson are known to be private people. And, we remain impressed with ScarJo as one day after filing the divorce papers, she released a statement saying that in the future she will not be discussing her divorce.  “As a devoted mother and private person and with complete awareness that my daughter will one day be old enough to read the news about herself, I would only like to say that I will never, ever be commenting on the dissolution of my marriage,” she stated. “Out of respect for my desires as a parent and out of respect for all working moms, it is with kindness that I ask other parties involved and the media to do the same. Thank you.” Scarlett, we hear you and we will respect your privacy and only report on facts as we know them and are substantiated.

But Johansson isn’t the only one releasing statements, Dauriac released one of his own that same day. He is not pleased that Scarlett filed papers with the court (FYI PROOF readers–a couple can’t get a divorce in the US without ultimately filing legal papers with the court. Yes, custody and other matters can be worked out without court involvement but only a court can issue a dissolution of marriage.) In fact, Dauriac asked Johansson to withdraw them in order to protect their daughter. The Frenchman said in his statement: “It is indeed unfortunate, especially for our daughter, that Scarlett filed in Court and made our personal differences so public. I would implore her to withdraw her action promptly and go back, as uncomfortable as it might be, to the negotiating table. We are the parents of a lovely daughter whom we will continue to co-parent for many years and share her joys and sorrows as only a parent can.”

What is particularly worrisome in this situation and has us thinking of poor Kelly Rutherford is that Dauriac’s lawyer has said that his client plans to petition the court to allow him and his daughter to move to France. Apparently, Johansson and Dauriac were in the middle of

private negotiations when she filed papers but it’s obvious that those discussions were not going quite how Johansson hoped and she wanted official court involvement. Depending on how broken those negotiations had become, we agree with this decision by Johansson and her team. Too much at stake here to play nice for too long.

We really hope that Johansson and Dauriac can come to an amicable solution regarding custody of Rose and that things don’t go the way of Kelly Rutherford, as we mentioned above.  Most of us know how that hellish multi-year, international custody battle ended: Rutherford losing custody of her two children to her Monaco-based ex, Daniel Giersch as well as causing her to go bankrupt. If Johannson and Dauriac can keep the best interest of Rose in mind at all times as the case progresses, there is a lot to gain, as top divorce lawyer, Brandy Austin, makes clear: “Having represented numerous clients in divorce proceedings, I can attest to the emotional impact a custody dispute has on a child. Although there are multiple interests involved, the child’s best interest is of utmost importance. A parent who puts the child’s interest before their own can often avoid a contentious battle in court and win the favor of the judge or jury.”

We do appreciate this couple’s desire to keep things private, much like Brad and Angelina’s recent decision regarding their divorce (of course this was only after issues regarding custody and care of their children became VERY public) but we can’t say we think this is going to be an easy one.  This custody matter seems primed to become an all out custody battle. Hopefully, the result will be the one that is in the best interest of young Rose Dorothy. We’re rooting for you little one.

Discussing celebrity news is what we enjoy most at PROOF. Please visit the rest of our site for more of our one of a kind take on celebrity news.

Nick Cannon Sued Over App | Celebrity News | Proof with Jill Stanley

Nick Cannon Sued for Stealing Unsuccessful App Idea

Nick Cannon may have just quit “America’s Got Talent” because he felt he was mistreated by the show (he said he felt silenced, controlled, and treated like a piece of property) – but he has even more drama ahead of him: he’s facing a lawsuit on an entirely unrelated matter.

Enrico Taylor is suing Cannon for allegedly stealing his idea for a talent discovery app. Taylor is seeking $1.75 million in damages.

 

In court documents, Taylor claims he met Nick in early 2015 and hoped to get Mariah Carey’s ex interested in his new app. The disgruntled app-maker says he told Cannon that he was working with rapper Birdman, who is the co-founder of Cash Money Records, to create a digital talent search app called “I Discover Stars.” Taylor claims that Cannon said he liked the idea but then Taylor never heard back from him about it. Five months later Cannon launched his own digital talent search app, N’credible.

Allegedly, Cannon’s app was intended to be an extension of his management and music company, N’credible Artists, and was for comedians, singers and rappers to audition for the former “America’s Got Talent Host” without him actually having to physically be at the audition. Sounds like a good idea, right?  Apparently though wannabe superstars didn’t flock to it. Taylor is claiming that not only did Cannon steal his idea, but also says that because Cannon’s app was a total bust, Taylor can’t get his own app off the ground – and now he wants $1.75 million as a compensation. That is quite a circuitous legal argument and not sure how persuasive it is going to be in a court of law. Think about: Taylor is seeking big bucks for an unsuccessful idea?!

bieb

We at PROOF are looking forward to seeing the evidence that comes out in this matter but if we were advising Cannon (which we are not–and here comes the PROOF legal disclaimer: nothing on PROOF should be construed as giving legal advice or the creation of an attorney client relationship) we would not recommend settling at this point. 

Discussing celebrity news is what we enjoy most at PROOF. Please visit the rest of our site for more of our one of a kind take on celebrity news.

Delta2

Scroll to Top