Celeb News

Channing and Jenna Divorced but Custody Issues Remain

Ok, we admit it, we were upset when Channing and Jenna announced they were ending their marriage back in April 2018, but we got over it, as did Channing and Jenna, clearly. Jenna is expecting a baby with boyfriend Stephen Kazee (she posts really cute IG stories about their relationship) and Channing has been dating singer Jessie J for quite some time. So, while life has moved on and their divorce has been granted, custody issues over their six year old daughter appear to be plaguing the former couple. They share joint custody but Channing has asked the court to intervene and issue an order detailing more precisely custody and visitation rights.

Issues that he seems to want a judicial stamp of approval on include, travel with Everly, holiday scheduling, taking her out of school, and facetime communication. In the court documents Channing stated that “over the past six months, it has become evident to me that a clear and specific holiday schedule is necessary and important.” This pretty plain statement leads us here at Proof to deduce that there have been some snafus in these arenas.

But before any of us get too worked up, perhaps we should look deeper into Channing’s other comments in the documents–most of which place the need for a court order on the unpredictable nature of both parents careers. In February 2019, the couple agreed to a schedule but due to their constantly changing work life, Channing believes flexibility would help ensure that both parents can work and have equal time with Everly. He also asked the court grant his request for appointment of a co-parenting counselor in order to help with scheduling conflicts. Although it has been reported that Jenna wants these very same things to us, all of this smacks of two people who actually can not agree and require the input of two third parties–the court and a counselor.

Channing added one more request to the court in his most recent filing: he asks that Everly’s name, image or likeness not be used for any sponsorship or ad campaign, even on social media, without the consent of both parents. Makes sense but interesting that these two really need the court to weigh in on this…

Whatever is in the best interest of the child is what we at Proof say (and that’s the law, by the way). So if a court order will reduce whatever conflict is going on here then we say “go for it, Channing.” You and Jenna can then continue moving on and doing what’s best for Everly.

Tentative Settlement in Weinstein Civil Suits

Scores of civil suits have been filed against Harvey Weinstein and his bankrupt film company. While not all of the suits are rooted in sexual misconduct claims, those that are may be coming to an end. Allegedly his insurance company has made a $25 million settlement offer to the victims.

This money will not be coming from Weinstein’s pockets but rather from an insurance policy, not unlike when an insurance company pays a car accident or other negligence claim. The insurance company also likely footed the bill for the lawyers and other litigation costs too. But don’t get too upset, this isn’t because of any special treatment for the rich and famous, it’s just how these types of claims and these types of insurance policies work. What you can get upset over is that as part of the settlement, Weinstein will not have to admit any wrongdoing nor apologize to the victims. It’s understandable why he doesn’t want to admit guilt (it’s primarily because of the upcoming criminal trial) but an apology could have been worked in and not damaged the rape case. Though, really what would be the point? Is Harvey Weinstein truly sorry for any of the pain he caused his victims? That’s a rhetorical question.

Another complexity is that the money is going to have to be shared by all the accusers. Divvying any global settlement is never an easy task. Ultimately, even if all relevant parties agree, the settlement will require court approval.

Bottom line: $25 million may sound like a lot but given the number of claimants, the degree to which they suffered, it’s not going to even come close to fairly and sufficiently compensating them for the wrongs Harvey Weinstein and his company committed.

One of R. Kelly’s Girlfriends Did Not Change Her Tune but One Did Move Out

Update: Turns out Joycelyn Savage did not speak out against R. Kelly and accuse him of sexual assault and other violent, disgusting, and criminal behavior. The webpage where she allegedly told her story has been taken down and Savage is still standing by R. Kelly denying any change of heart. Azriel Clary, Kelly’s other live in girlfriend (that’s just kinda weird to write, is it not?Two live in girlfriends?) though  has moved out of the Kelly’s Chicago apartment to pursue her singing career. Interesting though, she still supports the jailed singer.

Joycelyn Savage, one of  R. Kelly’s live-in girlfriends, is changing her tune. She has been defending him for years but now the 24 year old has made public that R. Kelly sexually, physically and emotionally abused her. Remember, Savage’s parents are the ones who have  been claiming that R. Kelly brainwashed their daughter and have kept her from having contact with them. 

Savage spoke her truth on a crowdfunding platform known as Patreon but the page was pretty quickly taken down. Not sure why that is but it is interesting to note that Savage’s claims were not unlike many of the other claims lodged against the singer and for which he now sits in jail awaiting trial. No need to get into the nasty, vile, disgusting (yes, we know all these words mean the same thing) details because most Proof readers know them well but suffice it to say, Savage having even at least partially and ephemerally (nothing is ever really gone from the internet anyway) telling her story is not helpful to R. Kelly’s case nor his unwavering claim of innocence.

  1. Kelly’s first criminal trial for sexual misconduct involving minors, among other things, is set for April 27, 2020 in Chicago federal court. On May 18, 2020 he stands trial for similar accusations in New York. No doubt is going to be a busy and expensive spring for the singer. Our bet is that he’s not walking this time-not in Chicago, not in New York.

For more information on the R. Kelly case, click here and here.

5 Celeb Break Ups that Bummed Us Out in 2019

1. Adele and Simon Konecki
The singer filed for divorce from her husband of six years in September 2019. The two share a six year old son, Angelo. Adele is worth tons of cash so in addition to custody, unless the couple executed an iron-clad, hyper inclusive prenup prior to marriage (word on the street is that there isn’t one), then asset distribution is going to be an issue. Money aside, we are super sad about this one–getting the tissues ready just thinking about the music that might flow out of Adele from this experience.

2. Justin Hartley and Chrishell Stause Hartley
In all honesty, we didn’t know who Chrishell was before the breakup announcement in November, but being such big fans of This Is Us just made us sad. Too much of real life mimicking Hollywood. Truth is we want all of that show’s stars to ride off happily into the sunset. But, alas, that is not to be as these two are divorcing after two years of marriage. This is Justin’s second divorce. He shares custody of his fifteen year old daughter with the first ex Mrs. Hartley.

3. Bradley Cooper and Irina Shayk
Certainly we all saw it coming and, by “we all,” I mean everyone who saw that Lady Gaga/Bradley Cooper performance of Shallow at the 2019 Oscars, nevertheless, at Proof we had hoped it was just a rumor. But, a rumor it was not. In June 2019, after 4 years of dating and one child (Lea de Seine), Bradley Cooper and Irina Shayk split. Apparently all is still amicable as of this writing and the two are sharing custody and financial support of Lea de Seine without the need for court involvement.

4. Sarah and Todd Palin
Maybe the title of this article overstates our true feelings about this couple. We were not so much bummed out as we were surprised. In fact, we were not bummed out at all but we were definitely surprised when in September 2019 we learned that Todd had filed for divorce after 31 years of marriage. The couple had five children together but only one, Trig, is a minor. Apparently the couple intends to share legal and physical custody of him. As for why we were surprised, perhaps it was the length of the union-31 years is a long time-but also Todd seemed to truly support his former Alaskan governor wife (despite repeated pretty ridiculous blunders) during the 2008 campaign when John McCain picked her as his running mate. Disastrous choice by McCain but, to outsiders, a marriage strengthener. Boy, were we wrong.

5. Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes
Yeah, we know there are no legal issues here: no divorce decree to be issued, no custody matters to be addressed, no assets to be distributed but still, we had to include these two because this break up bummed us out the most. We loved how Jamie and Katie kept so much of their relationship private. We loved how they seemingly made the long distance thing work. We loved how these two independent creative people respected and supported each other’s choices. Clearly our impressive view of them was misplaced because in May 2019, after six years of dating, the couple called it quits. Sadly, it seems as if it’s for good. Haven’t heard a peep about reconciliation. Oh well, it was good while it lasted.

Lawsuit Involving Johnny Depp and His Ex-Managers Aggressively Wages On

On January 13, 2017, Johnny Depp filed a lawsuit against his ex-business managers, The Management Group (TMG), the counts ranged from breach of contract to professional negligence. Depp claimed that TMG paid itself more than $28 million in fees without getting Depp’s written consent. (Is this the way Depp and TMG had been doing business for years? TMG was Depp’s manager for 17 years, was there a time when written consent was required and adhered to? These are factual and contractual issues that are going to be addressed in this suit). Depp also alleged that TMG didn’t file or pay his taxes on time. Hmmm. This seems like a pretty easy one. Taxes due April 15 (and likely quarterly!). TMG if it’s your job to pay them (which as Depp’s financial manager this would seem to be well within your job duties) you either do so or arrange for an extension.  This failure to file had pretty serious ramifications for the actor: Depp alleges it resulted in him owing more than $5.6 million in fees and penalties.

Depp also alleged that TMG “loaned” nearly $10 million of his money to third parties–without Depp’s authorization.  Ten million? We’re still trying to get back 50 bucks back for an Uber ride we covered for a friend whose app “wasn’t working.” But, as with all lawsuits, there are two sides. And, after reading lots of documents and emails between the parties and their representatives (click here to see our favorite one. It’s about how hard it is for him to curb holiday spending because he wants his kids to have a good Christmas.) TMG points are not without merit. In a nutshell, here is what they have to say for themselves: Depp caused his own financial ruin.

That’s the crux of their argument and at the initial hearing it seemed as if they were dead in the water.  Judge Beaudet, the presiding judge, dismissed TMG’s claims related to Depp’s alleged outrageous spending. Put simply, the Judge said Depp’s spending was irrelevant to the commission TMG claimed it was owed or for their work done transitioning their files to Depp’s new representatives–which is what Depp’s lawsuit is based on.

All was not lost for TMG because the judge ruled in their favor regarding their claim of promissory fraud. What is that? It’s when someone promises to do something but never had any intention of doing the thing promised. Here, it’s TMG’s allegation that Depp fraudulently induced them to work without compensation. To be clear, this does not mean that Depp committed fraud rather it means that for now TMG’s fraud claim can stand as there was sufficient information alleged in the complaint to make out the elements of the claim.

TMG naturally counted this as a win but went a step further, amending its cross complaint and adding new and different allegations about Depp’s spending. No doubt they expect the court will not dismiss this second attempt. In the July 2017 filing, TMG alleged that Depp led an “ultra-extravagant lifestyle” throughout the 17-years that Depp was represented by them. They detail a lifestyle that cost about $2 million per month–a lifestyle they say they warned Depp he could not keep up.  Once again, they included examples of how the star had un-repaid loans, financial debts, and a huge credit card bills.

Why does TMG keep talking about Depp’s spending? Motive. They assert that Depp, having spent too much of his own money, is going after them because he is broke and looking to dig himself out of a financial hole. TMG attorney Michael Kump said, “Depp’s exorbitant spending remains at the center of this case.” In those amended documents, TMG references specific friends and family members that they loaned Depp’s money to, on Depp’s direction. Depp is trying to get those names removed from the legal documents. Naturally TMG is not having that. Kump believes Depp is doing this to hide the identity of the friends and family as a way to protect himself because, as Kump has said, “Depp knows how ridiculous he will look when these false allegations are publicly disclosed.”

We don’t necessarily agree with Kump’s view of Depp’s intentions on seeking to redact the names of friends and family members. Depp’s decision to hide the identity of the friends and family members could simply be that he wants to protect them, not himself. They didn’t ask to become embroiled in a multi million dollar legal mess.

What has been going on in this case for months now are disputes over documents and information that TMG seeks. They served a subpoena on Depp and they believe they are entitled to the information they requested.  Depp’s team filed what is known as a motion to quash. Basically, he is seeking the court to side with him and not order him to turn over documents TMG is requesting. Depp believes the documents are confidential and TMG is not entitled to them.  The parties have been trying to resolve the differences out of court but so far, the dispute remains.  Certainly, in breach of contract matters, documents that show the pattern and practice of business and communication among the parties and relevant witnesses is critical evidence. But TMG is seeking documents that were exchanged between Depp and his attorney (not the attorney handling this lawsuit) as well as that between him and his long time agent at United Agency.

The case is set for trial January 2018 but given the complexity of the claims, we at PROOF expect that the trial date will be pushed out a few more months, at least.

 

 

“He’s a Psycho!”: Tom Arnold Says Mark Burnett Attacked Him at a Pre-Emmys Party

UPDATE: October 25, 2018 Prosecutors in LA refuse to charge Mark Burnett with regard to the alleged assault of Tom Arnold. Via Twitter, Arnold, however, has vowed to pursue the matter civilly.

The Apprentice producer (and creator of one of the first reality shows, Survivor), Mark Burnett, got into a physical altercation with Tom Arnold at a pre-Emmys party and it’s all over President Donald Trump. Do you maybe need to read that sentence again? An actor and a producer got into a fight over the President.

Let’s get you up to speed on this: Tom Arnold, whom you may know as a ’90s comedian and ex-husband of the controversial Roseanne Barr, has a new reality show on Viceland called The Hunt for the Trump Tapes. Arnold is looking for incriminating tapes from Trump’s time on The Apprentice which Trump allegedly used racial slurs, homophobic slurs, and sexist language. Good use of your time, Arnold, but what does Mark Burnett have to do with it?

Burnett is a MGM Television Chairman who Arnold has been prodding for those tapes in his quest to take Trump down. As it turns out, Burnett had enough of Arnold and when the two met in person, things got pretty intense, pretty fast.

Arnold and Burnett came face-to-face at a pre-Emmys party on Sunday, September 16, 2018, and though it’s unclear who started the fight, Arnold filed a police report for battery the following morning. He also sent a play-by-play to CNN, saying, “He’s a psycho. He lunged at me and full on chocked [sic] me as I was walking UP the stairs.” Arnold explained: “Took me a minute to get my footing before I could get his claw off me and fight back. It was crazy. My throat is soar [sic] but I’m fine. ” And because this all went down at an Emmy’s party, Arnold has some witnesses: “Kevin Bacon is a solid reliable brawl witness. Sosie Bacon is a wingman,” says the alleged victim.

Burnett’s wife Roma Downey (remember her from Touched by an Angel?), via twitter, refuted the claim that Burnett was the one doing the attacking. She included a photo of her hand, which allegedly was bruised in the melee, and tweeted: “Got this bruise tonight when Tom Arnold tried to ambush my husband Mark and me at a charity event. Is your TV show worth it Tom? Please stop.”

Arnold simply replied, “Bullsh-t. You lie your crazy husband attacked me you psycho. I’m filing police report & suing you for defamation.”

According to Arnold there’s video of the incident (from an Academy Award winning director, no less), “Roma knocked Bryan Fogel’s phone out of his hand after Mark Burnett chocked [sic] me. Bryan came with me. He won the Oscar this year for his amazing documentary Icarus. He has tape.” As of this writing said tape has not yet surfaced but it certainly would be an important piece of evidence—for both sides.

No arrests have yet been made nor lawsuits filed but the list of celeb witnesses continues with How I Met Your Mother’s Alyson Hannigan allegedly seeing the fight and Survivor host Jeff Probst being the person who broke it up. Small world out here in Tinseltown.

We’ll keep you posted on this one. There will surely be updates as it doesn’t seem likely Tom Arnold will back down—unless, of course, he gets those tapes!

Alec Baldwin Pleads Guilty

UPDATE: Wednesday January 23, 2019, Alec Baldwin pleaded guilty to a second-degree harassment stemming from a NYC parking spot dispute in November 2018. Baldwin was ordered to pay a fine and take an anger  management course (not too sure what a one day course will do but it’s better than nothing!). As noted below, Baldwin was originally charged with assault and harassment. Prosecutors offered the plea deal for a harassment violation due to Baldwin’s lack of criminal record.

Although he’s been relatively quiet, altercation-wise that is, not too many of us were surprised when we learned Alec Baldwin was arrested and charged with assault and harassment in New York on November 1, 2018–over a parking spot!

Parking spots are hard to come by in NYC
Though he has adamantly denied all of this allegedly Baldwin became enraged when another driver tried to pull into a parking that was being held for the actor. Baldwin was so angered by this that he reportedly punched the other driver, a 49 year old man, in the face. The man sustained injuries and was taken to a local hospital.  Yeah, we know parking in NYC can be a bit of a struggle but certainly Baldwin’s response seems extreme.

No sitting around in jail for this a-lister
Baldwin was taken down to the precinct and charged with assault and harassment. Lucky for him, his arrest was in NYC where if there is a less serious offense and low risk of flight by the defendant, police have the ability to issue a desk appearance ticket (DAT) which means an accused doesn’t have to wait around in jail for an arraignment (in NY this is supposed to occur within 24 hours of arrest anyway) but rather is simply given a date on which to return to court.  So, no, Baldwin did not get special treatment because he’s a celeb, this is routine in NY and it’s actually a good thing that allows for the system to run a little more efficiently. As with other court ordered appearances if a person who receives a DAT fails to show up in court then an arrest warrant is issued. No doubt Baldwin will be there on the specified date!

Baldwin’s history of aggressive behavior
So, we know Baldwin isn’t a flight risk and is generally not known as a terrible guy but he is known to be a hothead.  Though not a chargeable offense, some might remember his 2007 voicemail message to his then eleven year old daughter Ireland with ex Kim Basinger. Among the things he called her was “a rude, thoughtless, little pig.” Granted emotions were running high as the couple was in the middle of a messy custody battle but still, she was only eleven.

Much of Baldwin’s aggression, however, has been directed at paparazzi–this has been going on for decades. Back in 1995, when he and Kim were bringing Ireland home from the hospital, he sprayed shaving cream on the car windows of a photographer. A fight ensued and the photog claimed Baldwin punched him in the face. Baldwin was acquitted of misdemeanor battery. But two civil matters stemmed from the incident. One was Baldwin’s successful invasion of privacy suit against the photographer. The second was the photographer’s injury lawsuit for damages he allegedly suffered during the incident. Baldwin is said to have coughed up $4500-hardly a dent in his deep pocket.

In 2012, a photographer claimed Baldwin pushed and shoved him while the actor and his wife-to-be, Hilaria, were leaving City Hall after getting their marriage license. Baldwin denied these claims. He was never charged criminally for the incident.

A little more than a week later in 2012, a similar occurrence took place–this time captured on camera. A photographer had been following Baldwin for several blocks and when they were finally outside of Baldwin’s apartment, the photog had words with one of Baldwin’s neighbors. Baldwin was not having that, and on the video, which can be viewed online you can see Baldwin grabbing the photog’s arm and saying, among other things, “I want you to s— the f— up. Leave my neighbor alone. Did you hear what I said? You little girl.”

Replay the above in 2013, when yet another photographer claimed Baldwin pinned him against a car. Cops were called but no arrests were made. And again in 2013, he had a run in with yes, yet another photographer. This time no harmful physical conduct was claimed but apparently Baldwin used a homophobic slur. Via Twitter, the actor later apologized for using it and said he would retire it from his vocabulary.

In 2014, Baldwin was observed riding his bicycle the wrong way on Fifth Avenue. Apparently, police told Baldwin he was going the wrong way and when the officer asked for his identification, the actor refused and became belligerent. Baldwin was taken into custody and charged with disorderly conduct and riding a bike the wrong way. Per usual, Baldwin took to Twitter calling out the officer by name and badge number saying,” New York City is a mismanaged carnival of stupidity that is desperate for revenue and anxious to criminalize behavior once thought benign.”

Does the criminal justice system care about Baldwin’s past?
Does Baldwin’s history of aggression mean that he’s going to get the book thrown at him on this most recent charge? Seasoned Detroit criminal defense attorney, Ray Richards, argues to the contrary, “good defense counsel should argue that all of this prior behavior is completely irrelevant and should not be considered in this matter at any level.” The truth is, Baldwin had never been convicted of any criminal act and simply because a person has acted one way at other times in his life does not mean that he acted this way at the time in question.  In fact, there’s a rule of evidence (Federal Rule of Evidence 404 for those who want the details!) that speaks directly to this–it says that evidence of a crime, wrong or other act is inadmissibleto prove a person’s character in order to show that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character. Despite this very on point bit of law, might not be a bad idea for Baldwin to take some anger management classes, no?

 

 

Scroll to Top