Celebs

Celebrity News | Wyclef Jean Racial Profiling

Was Wyclef Jean the Victim of Racial Profiling

Rapper Wyclef Jean is calling for an investigation of racial profiling after being being stopped, handcuffed and detained by sheriff’s deputies in West Hollywood on Tuesday, March 21, 2017.

Jean says he was returning from a recording studio when he was pulled over. Via Twitter, Jean said he was,”asked by the police to put my hands up. Then I was told do not move. I was instantly handcuffed before being asked to identify myself.”

Jean continued to vent his anger on Twitter after the incident, writing, “I am sure no father wants his sons or daughters to see him in handcuffs especially if he is innocent.”

We agree with Jean–no son or daughter wants to see their father in handcuffs (this reminds us of the scene in The People v. OJ Simpson: American Crime Story when Johnny Cochran was pulled over, asked to exit his vehicle, slammed down on the hood by a cop while his two young daughters watched from inside the car. Cochran was an Assistant District Attorney at the time; he was very quickly released).  

Sheriff’s Sgt. Charles Duncan describes the events differently from Jean. Duncan says that the patrol units pulled Jean over because he was driving a vehicle matching the description of a suspect who robbed and pistol-whipped two people. The victims said the assailant was wearing a red bandana. Jean had on a red bandana at the time.

The L.A. County Sheriff’s Department also explained that a supervisor was on the scene during the incident in which Jean was detained for six minutes, and “explained to Mr. Jean about the investigation being conducted and the reasons behind his lawful detention.”

The Department said that Jean did not comply with the requests to remove his hands from his waistband and instead went to his trunk and did not follow instructions from deputies, which is why he was handcuffed during questioning.

Duncan said that when the deputies received more information and realized they did not have the assailant, they promptly released Jean.

The sheriff’s office eventually arrested two robbery suspects four blocks from where Jean was stopped.

While it’s a good thing the suspects were caught, we do understand Jean’s position especially in light of so much racial profiling recently as well as race related police brutality/police misconduct cases. And we also understand why Jean is concerned that the sheriff’s department is assassinating his character and calling him a liar.

Melanie Bonvicino, a spokeswoman for the singer, said, “Mr. Jean is requesting a formal investigation into racial profiling by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, LAPD chief Charlie Beck and the LA Sheriff’s Department while calling upon the ACLU and Black Lives Matter to join him in defense of civil liberties and racial bias.”

Despite Jean’s public call for an investigation, the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department maintains their story is accurate and that there was no racial profiling and the fact that Jean went to his trunk and ignored their requests is what prompted and justified the escalation to handcuffs. The Sheriff’s Department does say it would like to clear the air with Jean.

We at Proof are sensitive to the both sides here–the need and right of individuals to be able to move freely through one’s life and through one’s community without threat of suspicion of a crime as well as the police department’s need to investigate crime.  

This is not easy one though and we we hope that police cruiser dash cams recorded what went down with Jean so that the truth can come out.  We truly hope racial profiling played no role–there is simply no place for that in our world.

At PROOF there’s nothing we like to do more than to share celebrity news; and we love sharing that celebrity news with you! Browse the site and see what hits you.

Oscar De La Hoya Alcohol Troubles | Celebrity News | Proof With Jill Stanley

Arrest: Oscar De La Hoya Troubles with Alcohol Resurface

Former world champion boxer Oscar De La Hoya was arrested Wednesday, January 25, 2017 in Pasadena, California for driving under the influence. California Highway Patrol  (yep, that’s CHiPS for all of you who remember the television show from the late 70s/early 80s with Erik Estrada) saw him speeding on Del Mar Boulevard in the early morning hours and pulled him over.  Officers performed field-sobriety tests; De La Hoya failed and was arrested (he was later released into the custody of his manager). The legal limit in California, as in most states, is .08%, and according to local law enforcement, De La Hoya was over that.

This arrest is particularly sad for the 43 year old boxer who been battling drug and alcohol addiction for years. Back in 2011 De La Hoya spoke publicly about his addiction, the fact, that he first started drinking at 9 years old at family gatherings in East Los Angeles. He also spoke of the role addiction played in the incredibly embarrassing incident from 2007 in which he was photographed in a hotel with another woman (not his wife), dressed in high heels, fishnets and lingerie.  When those photos became public, De La Hoya vehemently argued that they were fake. And due to his Golden Boy image, most believed him—it was hard for anyone to imagine this good looking, successful, boxing champ doing such a thing. But in 2011, De La Hoya admitted the photos were real and that the incident was fueled by his addiction to alcohol and cocaine.  In that very candid interview, De La Hoya said that his addiction and this incident had him feeling so low that he considered suicide.  Think about that. This world famous, successful boxer struggling so much that he wants to leave the world—leave his kids, his wife, alter his legacy forever.

And as for the woman in those cross dressing photos? Well, Milana Dravnel, a stripper, claimed to have had a year long extramarital affair with De La Hoya and said that De La Hoya was in fact in those images and that he willingly engaged in the incident. So what she’d do? Did she kiss her lover goodbye and wish him well? Nope. She sued him. She said he defamed her by telling the world the photos were fake when she was telling the world they were real. She also alleged that not only did De La Hoya’s team force her to recant her statements that the photos were real but they made her sign a legal document that prohibited her from selling the photos further (She had already sold them once and had done an interview about them on Entertainment Tonight).  De La Hoya settled the matter out of court, allegedly for $20 million.  Boy, did he pick the wrong woman to mess with.

To me, and to many others, it was almost amazing to consider that this icon, this American boxer who won gold at the 1992 Barcelona Olympics (hence the nickname), this media darling, this father, husband, and role model to many, fell so low. But De La Hoya’s story shines a light on the power of addiction, the way it can devastate lives. It proves that money, success, influence does not make you immune. And for many years, up until this new arrest, there was a bright side for De la Hoya. Though he retired from boxing in 2009, in 2011 he got treatment for his addiction, worked hard to get his life back together, and seemingly had done so. That is what makes this recent arrest so sad. Let’s hope it’s not a sign of a deeper problem for the former champ.  And, if it is, let’s hope he has the ability and the will to get back up again and fight.

Prison for Alanis Morissette's Manager | Celebrity News | PROOF with Jill Stanley

Prison for Alanis Morissette’s Manager

Alanis Morissette’s former business manager, Jonathan Schwartz, has been busted for wire fraud and for filing false tax returns. In addition to stealing $4.7 from Alanis, Schwartz also stole $1.7 million from other clients.  Because of the seriousness of the charges against him, Schwartz faced 23 years in federal prison. But, he has entered into a plea deal with federal prosecutors in which he will serve from four to six years in prison. He’s also on the hook for $8.2 million in restitution.

Financial Adviser Ryan Wibberley

So, how did Alanis get snowed? She tried to do the right thing regarding her finances– she hired Schwartz, a financial advisor at GSO Business Management, a California company that touts itself as a premier business management firm. Even if we don’t have a lot of money, most of us are unsure of where to put our money, how to invest, how to plan for retirement so it’s especially smart for Alanis and others with high net worth to hire professionals to handle their money. The level of trust people put in their financial managers is high and when one gets ripped off by them, it really stings. Not just because hard earned money is missing but because being duped by someone we trust never feels good. What did Schwartz do with Alanis’ money? He spent $75,000.00 of it to pay off a gambling debt (nice that a financial advisor has a gambling problem. Not sure how that got past GSO). And, more than $50,000 for a lavish vacation to Bora Bora. Clearly, Alanis was not one of his travel companions.  He also invested some of it in illegal marijuana growing business. Yup, an illegal one. This guy is too much.

Lucky for Alanis (who had fired Schwartz in 2016), her new manager quickly realized Schwartz had been stealing from her. Naturally Alanis was pissed. She threatened to sue GSO for the missing money because Schwartz was acting in his capacity as a partner in the firm at the time of the theft. GSO claimed Schwartz was operating outside that scope of his job, had gone rogue, and Schwartz, not GSO, was solely responsible. GSO did act swiftly and suspended Schwartz (they are also suing him) but that’s not enough to shield them from liability. In June 2016, Alanis reached a settlement with GSO (and Schwartz) and as far as Alanis’ civil matter regarding Schwartz’s unethical behavior and GSO’s responsibility that case is closed.  And, because Schwartz has already plead guilty in the criminal and is awaiting sentencing on February 1, 2017, the criminal matter will soon be over as well. Still pending, however is GSO’s action against Schwartz. Going to be a little difficult to pursue with Schwartz behind bars. Time will tell what if any insurance coverage may come into play here (likely not much because insurance doesn’t generally kick in when there’s intentional, illegal behavior as opposed to negligence).
Alanis joins a long list of celebrities who have been taken advantage of by someone with a fiduciary responsibility to them. Ben Stiller had $250,000 ripped off by his financial advisor Dana Giachetto, Sting lost close to $10 million, Uma Thurman a million. And, As PROOF recently reported, Johnny Depp just filed a $25 million fraud lawsuit against his business managers.

Bad Celebrity Motorcycle Accidents | Keanu Reeves | celebrity news

10 of the Worst Celebrity Motorcycle Accidents

Riding a motorcycle is not a joke — if you crash on a bike, severe injury or death often occurs. Naturally, being a celebrity doesn’t make one immune from these risks. Lawsuits involving what some in the medical field refer to as donor cycles abound and though very often it is not the motorcyclist who is at fault they are the ones who suffer the most serious of injuries. Below we review 10 of the worst celebrity motorcycle crashes to date.

Lauren Hutton

Model and actress Lauren Hutton was riding with a squad, which included Dennis Hopper and Jeremy Irons, near Las Vegas for a charity ride supporting the Hermitage-Guggenheim Museum in October 2001. She went down during the ride in a crash that caused her to break both legs and arms, crushed three ribs, and punctured a lung. Maybe it was a good thing she was unconscious so she didn’t feel all the pain or notice the bone protruding from her leg.

Lucky for her and a good reason to ride with friends because that day both Hopper and Irons encouraged her to wear protective gear like leathers and a full-face helmet. Those may have saved her life but one thing is for sure, they definitely saved her famous face!

Gary Busey

Gary Busey has been known to be pretty unruly for a while now. Could it be due to a coma-inducing motorcycle accident back in 1988? Though the actor was known to be a skilled and avid rider he was also anti-helmet.  So when he went down in that accident that day, he naturally wasn’t wearing one.  He fractured his skull and sustained head injuries that required several hours of neurosurgery. Busey’s doctors said that his injuries might cause permanent brain damage. In fact, when Busey was on Celebrity Rehab in 2008, psychiatrist Dr. Charles Sophy said that the the brain injury had essentially resulted in “weakening Busey’s mental filters.” Perhaps that explains it . .  .

Peter Fonda

“Easy Rider” star Peter Fonda is a man who loves motorcycles so it’s not surprising that he has had more than one accident. In 1964, the wild man decided to wear nothing but a bathing suit and loafers for a ride on his Triumph. He hit a speed bump and went down. He suffered pretty serious injuries including bruises and broken bones but he recovered.  In 1985, he got into another wreck. This time the injuries were more severe–he broke his neck and back, causing him to lose a half inch of height after surgeries.  That didn’t stop the not-so-easy rider. In 1993, he had a head on collision with a deer, which did actually have some affect on his conduct. He says that accident stopped him riding after dark and without all his gear on. Better late than never!

Keanu Reeves

Keanu Reeves, a big fan of British motorcycles, broke his ankle while riding his bike near his Beverly Hills home back in 1996. He was on crutches for months after the crash. And, it wasn’t his first bike related accident. In 1988, Reeves, who is known as a risk taker, rode his bike on a twisting canyon road with the lights off. He crashed but didn’t suffer  injury. PROOF is very familiar with these canyon roads, especially the ones in Malibu. There are always motorcycles on them- we can definitely see the appeal but even in a car during the day these roads can sometimes be pretty intimidating.

Ben Roethlisberger

Former Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger almost died when he was involved in a his motorcycle accident near downtown Pittsburgh back in 2006. The Super Bowl champ may be a great playmaker but he wasn’t so smart that day: he was riding without a valid license (he only had a learner’s permit) and he wasn’t wearing a helmet. Big Ben took a big risk that day with his life and his career. Not that money was an issue for Roethlisberger at the time of the accident but perhaps he was smarter about insurance than he was about protective gear.

Billy Idol

In 1990, rocker Billy Idol learned that not all rules can be broken when he crashed his motorcycle into a car after he ran a stop sign in Los Angeles. His leg was mangled so badly that it almost had to be amputated. A steel rod was put in place and though he had to spend more than six months in bed after the crash, he has been seen riding since that accident.

Erik Estrada

“CHiPs” actor Erik Estrada learned how to ride a motorcycle for his famous television show and once he got the hang out of it he clearly enjoyed being a two-wheeler. But back in 1980, he had a serious crash on set. Estrada was following a camera car down an alley in Pacoima, CA, and lost control of his bike. He was thrown onto the hood of the car and his bike landed on him while 75 members of the cast and crew watched. His injuries included broken ribs and a collapsed lung. Producers wrote the crash into the storyline, filming his character’s scenes from his real-life hospital bed. And, despite the severity of the crash and his injuries, he was back on set and on a bike pretty soon!

Duane Allman

Allman Brothers rock guitarists Duane Allman died after a motorcycle accident in 1971 when swerved to avoid a truck and went down. The guitarist was riding his Harley-Davidson Sportster in Macon, GA and reportedly slowed to let a flatbed truck make a left-hand turn in front of him. Apparently, Allman swerved toward the center of the road to swing around the outside of the truck, but the truck suddenly stopped and Allman ran into it and that knocked him off his motorcycle, which bounced up in the air and off of Allman’s chest before skidding to a stop along the curb. Interestingly though Allman did not die instantly; he died later that day in surgery.

David Hasselhoff

The former “Baywatch” star crashed his motorcycle in Los Angeles in 2003, resulting in not-so serious in injuries to him but very serious injuries to his passenger, his then-wife Pamela Bach,. Hasselhoff told investigating officers that he and his wife were riding his 2003 Harley-Davidson near a freeway overpass when a gust of wind forced him to lose control of the bike, which made him run into a curb, throwing the couple. It should be noted that Pamela Bach sites that accident as the turning point in her marriage when she felt she could no longer cover up her husband’s problem with alcohol. Lucky for her she can’t remember anything about the crash (or if Hasselhoff was drunk at the time) except waking up in hospital. Pamela remained in hospital for two months, had 17 operations which has left her with two steel rods and 27 screws in her left leg. FYI, the couple has been divorced since 2006.

Ann-Margaret

Ann-Margaret is a long time motorcycle lover. She was thrown from her motorcycle in Brainerd, Minnesota in August of 2000. She suffered three broken ribs and a fractured left shoulder but amazingly enough, the next day, the “Bye, Bye Birdie” star managed to still appear as the Grand Marshal of the Colonel’s Truck Accessories National Hot Rod Association Nationals, riding in a pace car with her left arm in a sling. The show must goes on, I guess!

Lots of morals to motorcycle accident stories but the biggest one–wear protective gear!

Mel Gibson Pays Robert Downey Jr's Insurance | Celeb News | PROOF with Jill Stanley

Are You Ready to Be a Mel Gibson Fan Again? This Might Just Convince You

If Hacksaw Ridge isn’t enough to convince you to be a Mel Gibson fan again, learning about this very cool thing he did for an A-lister just might! As many know, Mel Gibson struggled with an alcohol addiction. And, it was an alcohol related arrest that lead to the incident involving the anti-semitic rant that had many of us enraged, let down and no longer supportive of Gibson. We also know that since that arrest Gibson has apologized to the Jewish community and that he has tried to make amends. Now, 10 years later, he seems to finally be finding his way back into Hollywood’s better, if not good, graces. His film, Hacksaw Ridge, has been nominated for a Golden Globe. But there is a little-known story about him that may also help change what some think of him.

It’s the story of how he helped out fellow troubled celeb, Robert Downey Jr. After Downey’s repeated run-ins with the law due to his addiction issues, Hollywood was afraid to work with him; no insurance company would insure him. They were all worried that Downey would relapse, that he would fail to show up for work or be unable to learn his lines. Basically, they no longer believed Downey could do his job. If Downey did in fact fail, the cost to the production and the insurance company would be high. In the insurance terms, Downey was worse than a sixteen year old male driving a Porsche—he was simply too high a risk. So what did Gibson do? He underwrote insurance coverage for Downey. This means that if Downey did, in fact, fail to do his job and an insurance claim was triggered, Mel would have to pay for the loss. I don’t know about you but this act of kindness and assumption of personal risk deserves some recognition. And, more, Gibson’s actions shows empathy. Not a bad trait to have.

**One more little note about these two: both have received acts of clemency, integral parts of the American justice system. Downey received a criminal pardon from Governor Jerry Brown of California in 2015 for his conviction and in 2009 a Malibu judge dismissed/expunged Gibson’s 2006 drunk driving conviction from his record. I’d say it’s probably time for all of us to move on.

celebrity News | Michael irvin accused of rape

Michael Irvin, Former Dallas Cowboy, Under Investigation for Rape

Michael Irvin, former wide receiver for the Dallas Cowboys is under investigation by Fort Lauderdale police for sexual battery. A 27-year-old woman claimed he raped her at the W hotel in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on March 21, 2017. Irvin denies the claims. Oddly this is the third time Irvin has been accused of sexual assault. Note though, he has never been formally charged in connection with any of those accusations. Very odd indeed.

The former Cowboy claims that the woman was a longtime friend of his, and has stated that the hotel’s surveillance footage would vindicate him. The football star says he and a group of friends were drinking until 4:30am when the woman followed him back to his hotel room. He claims that she was very drunk and that they were only in the room 15 minutes before he left to catch a flight, so he couldn’t have raped her. The “I was only was in there for 15 minutes, so nothing could have happened” is not a legal defense that is going to work. He is going to have to come up with something better which we guess is his goal by continuing to claim he did not have sexual contact with the woman.

According to the report, the woman said that she and Irvin were in a bar together before going back to their room. She claims she felt sick and only remembers fighting off his advances. She then told cops she feared she had been drugged and raped, and went to a medical facility to have a swab and blood test done. That last step was a smart move.

Irvin’s lawyer, Larry Friedman, said the following about the incident: “Michael was in Fort Lauderdale visiting his nieces and nephews at a track meet. He was also visiting his 90-year-old aunt and attending her birthday party. He was blindsided by news of these allegations.” The lawyer went on to say, “Even the complaint that she made specifically says she does not recall the events that took place. She was very drunk that night. Nothing happened and there was no assault.”

Of course, at this point the only two people who know what happened in that room is Irvin and the woman but the fact that she alleges she was drugged certainly makes recalling the event difficult.  Hopefully the medical evidence collected will help reveal the truth in this very troubling situation.

Interested in learning more celebrity news? Please peruse PROOF. We have tons of celebrity news articles about your Hollywood favorites. 

Selling An Oscar Award | Celebrity News

Selling an Oscar? We’ll Give You $1.00 Says the Academy

Ever wonder what happens if an Oscar winner decides she doesn’t want her award anymore? Maybe it’s just taking up space on her mantle or in her bathroom (where Juliette Binoche keeps hers) or a sock drawer (Anna Paquin’s hiding place).  Or maybe, that winner has passed away and her heirs have bills to pay and want to sell it (or melt it down!). Or maybe, the actor just needs some extra cash? Toss that thing up on EBay or let a high-end auction house like Sothebys sell it? Guaranteed to yield big bucks, right? Well, no, actually.  Because since 1951 Oscar winners and their heirs, are prohibited from selling the gold statuette without first offering to sell it back to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (prior to 1951 there was no such rule).

At first blush, this may sound okay. The Academy must have a lot of money.  They put on that fancy, seemingly never-ending show each year. Surely they know better than anyone else the value of an Oscar. Easy. Let them buy it.  Well, again, that’s a no, assuming the winner wants to make some money on the sale. You see, in the fine print of the Academy’s regulations, there’s the following language: “Award winners shall not sell or otherwise dispose of the Oscar statuette, nor permit it to be sold or disposed of by operation of law, without first offering to sell it to the Academy for the sum of $1.00. This provision shall apply also to the heirs and assigns of Academy Award winners who may acquire a statuette by gift or bequest.” So that’s what a winner gets if she sells her Oscar to the Academy—one dollar (it used to be $10.00 but they lowered it!).  And each winner must sign the Academy’s regulations. If she refuses to sign, then no Oscar.  As you can imagine, so far no one has refused to sign but it’s also probably fair to say that very few have read the fine print!

Despite these strict rules, reportedly up to 150 Oscars have been sold. Industry experts estimate that the prices have ranged from $60,000 to $1.5 million. Many that have been sold were Oscars awarded post the 1951 ban.  The Academy is not sitting idly by and letting this happen.   They are bringing lawsuits, seeking punitive and compensatory damages as well as demanding the return of the statue. So far, courts seems to be on their side.  In 2015 an LA court showed support for the Academy’s position and denied a motion for summary judgment in the legal battle waging between the Academy and heirs of Joseph Wright who won an Oscar for best color and art direction in the 1942 film My Gal Sal.  This Oscar was clearly won before the 1951 rule was enacted so, among other things, Wright’s heirs argued it could be sold. But, because Wright was a member of the Academy until his death in 1985, the Academy contended the Oscar must be offered back to them.  And the judge agreed.  According to Judge Feuer, the LA County Superior Court judge who decided the matter, she was not applying the law retroactively to Wright but rather it was that his membership in the Academy was predicated on his agreement to the new right of first refusal in its bylaws.  She further pointed out that “As of 1951, Wright was free to leave the Academy and sell his Oscar on the free market, but instead decided to retain his membership subject to the new bylaws.” If you’d like to read Judge Feuer judgment that all parties stipulated (agreed) to, please click here.

Though so far the court has agreed, not all legal experts do. Some question the legal enforceability of the Academy’s regulations and others argue that because Oscar statues are considered the property of the winner, winners should be able to do what they wish with it. Make sense, right? The winner put in the hard work, rightfully won the award, why should they have any restrictions?

The Academy has a convincing counter argument. Dawn Hudson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Academy since 2011, has said that the Academy never intended the Oscar to be treated as an article of trade, and making it so diminishes its value and that it should remain as recognition of creative effort not for commercial purposes. Hollywood big wigs seem to agree with Ms. Hudson.  Steven Spielberg, himself an Oscar winner, bought Bette Davis’ 1938 Best Actress Oscar for Jezebel for $578,000 and returned it to the Academy (he has bought others and returned them as well).  If you’re following the argument, he was allowed to legally buy this Oscar because it was prior to the 1951 rule but because he has been a member of the Academy after 1951 he was bound by the rule (more likely though he returned it because he agrees with their position about recognition of creative efforts). Kevin Spacey did the same with George Stoll’s 1945 Oscar for Anchors Aweigh for which he paid $157,000.

I applaud what these A-listers are doing  and I understand the Academy’s position—I’m just not so sure I agree with it, from a legal standpoint.

Want more stories to feed your celebrity news fix? Check out what PROOF has to say about celebrity divorce, celebrity arrests, and other breaking celebrity news.

Kendall Jenner robbed | celebrity news

Kendall Jenner is the Latest Kardashian to Have Her Jewelry Stolen

Another day, another Kardashian crime victim–thankfully no threat of violence in this one.

Kendall Jenner is reporting that $200,000 worth of jewelry was stolen from her jewelry box in her Hollywood Hills home. While this theft occurred in the midst of the rash of celebrity burglaries at the hands of the knock-knock burglars, it’s not likely the result of that gang of thieves (For more information about the recent knock-knock burglaries, click here).  Most think the culprit is someone Kendall knows or a friend of a friend who has access to her house because there were no signs of forced entry at the property.

On March 15, the 21-year-old hosted a party at her $6.5 million mansion, but for some reason she left her home for about an hour around midnight. Kendall’s security guard was stationed outside of the home but that didn’t prevent the bling stealing. Both a Rolex and Cartier are among Kendall’s missing goods. Apparently, Kendall didn’t realize the items were missing until after 1 AM but she called the police as soon as she did and reported the theft.

Much like her sister, Kim after the Paris burglary, Kendall fired the security guard who was hired to protect her and her house. Can’t imagine either of these guys thought they might be keeping their jobs. Good, swift decision, Kendall. You need someone who can actually do what they’re hired to do.

To date a suspect has not been identified but Jenner’s home has surveillance cameras so police are hopeful the footage will help find whoever is responsible for this crime.

Obviously we do not think Kendall deserved this anymore than Kim did or all the other celebs who have had their property stolen these past few months but police do suggest that celebs stop posting about their lavish lives on social media — it just makes it all too easy for criminals.  

Interestingly, Detective Dunn of the LAPD also suggests that celebs “go public” and describe what has been stolen as it can help recover the items. For example, this has helped recover a stolen Super Bowl ring, among other things.

Though we know it’s not popular to say we feel bad for a Kardashian but we do feel sorry for Kendall. At PROOF we don’t like to see anyone used, taken advantage of or being the victim of a crime just because of who they are. We hope the thief responsible is apprehended and the world soon knows the type of “friend” this person really is.

Seeking more celebrity news? Check out other PROOF articles.  We cover celebrity news like no one else!

No Grand Theft of Lohan | Celebrity Gossip | PROOF with Jill Stanley

Game Over for Lindsay Lohan in Video Game Case

Lindsay Lohan is no stranger to the judicial system, but this time she was a plaintiff (not a criminal defendant) seeking compensation from Grand Theft Auto V’s  (GTA V) developer, Rockstar Games, and parent company, Take-Two Interactive Software, for featuring a game character, Lacey Jonas, allegedly modeled off of her. Karen Gravano, star of Mob Wives, filed a separate suit against the same defendants, claiming that another game character, Andrea Bottini, resembled her appearance, her voice and her life story.

The basis of both claims were similar: a violation of a New York right-of-publicity law which says that use of a person’s image or voice for advertising or trade purposes is unlawful without consent from the individual.  Both Lohan and Gravano argued there was no prior permission or consent to use what they claimed were their images and/or voice. As for Lohan’s claims, the lawsuit noted two specific images of a “red bikini girl” that are seen on the GTA V box cover and at the start of the game. Ms. Lohan’s legal team contended that the cartoon blonde woman is a rendition of Lohan whose bikini, accessories, hair, and peace sign all resemble her. The lawsuit states “The Plaintiff has been using the peace sign hand gesture for years before and after its use in the video game.” The second image at issue appears on the disc cover and displays a woman being frisked by a police officer. The character is wearing a fedora style hat, sunglasses, daisy dukes and a white tee shirt with words Love First on it. Lohan’s lawyers claimed that the defendant “capitalized on the use of [the Plaintiffs] clothes style” and that there appeared to be an LO on the character’s shirt  which is “subliminally suggesting ‘LO’ for Lohan”.  Not sure how else you can spell LOVE without an “L” and an “O” but Lindsay’s lawyers still made this claim with a straight face. They further argued that a GTA V player avatar, whose mission includes helping a celebrity actress escape the paparazzi, includes identical events to Lohan’s real life (like all the fun times she had at Chateau Marmont where she allegedly racked up more than $45,000 in unpaid bills).

In March,  a New York judge denied Defendants’ motion dismiss the case. They appealed that decision and, on September 1, 2016, an appellate panel of 5 judges, who combined the Lohan and Gravano matters as they addressed the same legal issues, dismissed the lawsuits, saying “…this video game does not fall under the statutory definitions of advertising or trade.” Basically this means that even if the depictions of the characters did resemble Lohan and Gravano the right of publicity law on which the claims were based was not applicable and did not provide legal protection. The judges found that the game lacked direct name references and exact facial features of Gravano and Lohan and that it had its own unique story, characters, dialogue, and environment.  All of that combined with the player’s ability to choose how to proceed in the game, render it a work of fiction and satire and therefore protected by the First Amendment. Who knew Lindsay Lohan would play a role in the development of constitutional law??

Well, looks like it’s Game Over for Lohan and Gravano—unless they appeal; and I don’t think that’s likely.

Judge in Casey Anthony Trial Speaks Out

Casey Anthony, who was infamously acquitted of murdering her two-year-old daughter, Caylee, may have accidentally killed her with chloroform, says the Florida judge who presided in the matter. Judge Belvin Perry is no longer on the bench and now works in the private sector but despite the fact that authorities were never able to determine an exact cause of death for Caylee, Judge Perry thinks he may know what happened.

The former judge was on headline news recently when he said that he thought it was “more than likely” that Anthony accidentally killed her daughter by using too much chloroform. Perry said the toddler’s death could have been the result of an accidental overdose of the anesthetic. Chloroform is banned in the United States. Referencing the high levels of chloroform found in the trunk of Anthony’s car (Why was a banned, lethal substance in Anthony’s car?), Perry said, “It’s quite evident that whoever did this, and more than likely it may have been Casey, used too much [chloroform].”

During Anthony’s shocking trial, prosecutors argued that the young mother killed her daughter on June 16, 2008, by using chloroform and covering her nose and mouth with duct tape, then putting the little girl’s body in her trunk before dumping her in the woods. The inhumanity of the mother’s alleged crime shocked the world. Anthony’s defense was that the two-year-old drowned in the family pool.

In a verdict that that seemed to cause the world to take a collective gasp, Anthony was found not guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse and aggravated manslaughter of a child. She was convicted of four counts of providing false information to law enforcement. (There was more legal good news for Anthony– two of those convictions were overturned on appeal.)

Was is interesting to us here at PROOF is that Perry also said that because Caylee did not show any signs of previous abuse, he believes that her 2008 death was “purely accidental.” We’re unsure how something could be purely accidental when it involves allegation of use of an illegal product. And let’s not forget some of the other facts surrounding little Caylee’s death. Was it purely accidental that no one alerted police that she was missing for an entire month after her disappearance? Was it accidental that that someone looked up “chloroform” on the Anthony family computer three months before Caylee’s death? Moreover, why is Perry speaking out now and why is he making known his opinion about the death being accidental? We can’t imagine who benefits from his sharing his thoughts at this point.

For those of you wondering, double jeopardy prevents Casey from being charged with Caylee’s death again. (Double jeopardy in Florida is governed both by state law as well as federally by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution which provides that “no person shall be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”)

Seeking more celebrity news? Check out other PROOF articles.  We cover celebrity news like no one else!

Top Criminal Lawyer Elizabeth New Jersey | Teresa Guidice Mug Shot | Celebrity Criminal News | PROOF with Jill stanley

Teresa and Joe Giudice Thought They Were Above the Law

Teresa and Joe Giudice of Real Housewives of New Jersey notoriety (notice I don’t say fame) bragged constantly on air and social media about their family, their money and their material possessions. To many, they were brash, rude and offensive so in 2013 when they faced a federal multi-count indictment detailing white collar crimes ranging from conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud and bank fraud to making false statements on loan applications, to bankruptcy fraud, among other things, there was not a great deal of empathy for the showy duo. (Note that Joe faced additional charges for failing to file tax returns from 2004-2008.)

Teresa and Joe pleaded not guilty to the charges in the federal indictment and so solid (delusional?) was Teresa’s belief in her innocence that her lawyer stated that they were looking forward to vindication. As we all well know, that vindication was not to come because on March 4, 2014, Teresa and Joe struck a plea deal with prosecutors. They each pleaded guilty to various counts of fraud; Joe’s plea included a count for failing to file tax returns.

Borneo_testimonial2

On October 2, 2014, the mother of four was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison.  Joe was sentenced to 41 months, followed by possible deportation to Italy, where he was born (his parents moved him to the Garden State when he was a year old). In addition the couple was ordered to pay $414,000 in restitution.

From the bench, U.S. District Court Judge Esther Salas, who presided over the case, said to Teresa, “For a moment I thought about probation but I think a period of confinement is absolutely necessary in this case.” The judge added, “I don’t honestly believe that you understand or respect the law. I need to send a message. In the eyes of the law, it doesn’t matter who you are. There are consequences to pay.”

And pay they have … Teresa went off first and began her sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut on January 5, 2015. She was released two months early on the morning of December 23, 2015. Respected Elizabeth New Jersey criminal lawyer, Michael Borneo, said the following about Teresa’s sentence: “Judges typically have tremendous discretion when sentencing a criminal defendant. It amazes me how often clients show disrespect to the court and learn this lesson the hard way. By all accounts, Teresa Giudice could have avoided prison. Her poor attitude tilted the scales of justice against her.”

Joe is a different story and is currently serving his 41-month sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fort Dix, New Jersey. Note that this matter isn’t Joe’s first run-in with the law nor his first criminal conviction. In November 2013, he stood trial on charges that in 2010 he used his brother’s marriage and birth certificates to illegally obtain a driver’s license. Joe’s license had been suspended as a result of a DUI earlier that year and apparently he thought this was a good way to get a new one! All that waiting around at DMV for nothing.  Joe was convicted, his license was revoked for 12 months, and he was sentenced to 20 days of community service.

Many of us had hoped that being convicted of a crime, publicly humiliated, and shipped off to prison forcing her to be away from her beloved daughters (despite her many shortcomings it is obvious that Teresa is committed to her family and loves her girls very much) would have changed Teresa but it appears it did not. Teresa maintains her innocence and ignorance about the charges levied against her. She still posts pictures of herself and her girls on Instagram which depict a lavish style–one of fancy clothes, jewelry, and just plain over abundance. Prison may be a reality check for many but not for this Jersey reality queen.

I do give great credit to Judge Salas for allowing Joe and Teresa to serve their sentences at different times so that one parent could be home with the children while the other was “locked up”. The kids didn’t ask for this drama in their lives and having both parents gone at the same time would have been very traumatic for them.

If you enjoyed reading about the criminal mess these New Jersey “celebs” created for themselves, please visit the rest of PROOF for more of our one of a kind take on celebrity news.

Delta2

Top Criminal Lawyer Elizabeth NJ

[Category: Teresa Giudice | New Jersey | Top Criminal Lawyer Elizabeth NJ]

Mariah Carey New Year's Eve Meltdown | Celeb Legal Gossip | PROOF with Jill Stanley

There Could Be Legal Ramifications in the Mariah Carey New Year’s Eve Debacle

Depending on the language of the contract, Mariah could sue Dick Clark Productions for breach of contract for failing to provide what she needed or even reasonably expected in order for her to perform properly thus causing her to suffer damage to her reputation. On the flip side, Dick Clark Productions may also have a breach of contract claim because Mariah, being a very experienced singer, should have been able to work through the “technical glitches” in a more professional way and one in which fulfilled the requirements mandated by the contract.

The finger pointing has already begun with Mariah’s camp saying Dick Clark Productions engaged in acts of sabotage against her and Dick Clark Productions camp saying it was Mariah’s decision not to do a sound check herself, and, the sound was just fine — ear piece or not.

With more than 2 million people in Times Square on New Year’s Eve, millions more watching at home, and the millions Mariah likely received for her performance, there’s a lot at stake here. But how about a shout out for the dancers? They seemed to handle it all in stride!

Mark Wahlberg Isn’t About to Get a Pardon, But Check Out the Celeb Who Did

Pardon, the governmental act that bestows official forgiveness upon someone convicted of a crime is an important aspect of the American justice system. Getting a pardon doesn’t mean one is innocent or that the crime did not occur; but it does mean one can get some rights back, such as the right to vote, sit on a jury or hold office (I know what some of you are thinking, who cares about any of that? I would love an excuse to get out of jury duty!).  But, to the convicted felon a pardon is important and often has more to do with actually feeling forgiven and reducing the stigma associated with being a convict than anything else.

Mark Wahlberg comes to mind for many of us when we think of celebrities and pardons.  And there’s good reason for that. In November 2014, he petitioned the governor of Massachusetts for a pardon for his 1988 convictions for criminal contempt, assault and battery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, and possession of a class D controlled substance.  He was not yet 17 at the time of the convictions but was treated as an adult in the eyes of the law. He was sentenced to 2 years in prison (He only served 45 days; the rest was suspended). After being released he went on to become a pretty well known rapper—Marky Mark.  You would have thought he would have learned his lesson but, no, in 1992, he had another fight. This time he fractured someone’s jaw. Ultimately, Wahlberg did not face criminal charges for that incident but rather settled the matter in the civil arena. Putting those two violent incidents aside as well all the other issues that defined his very troubled youth, such as extensive drug use and hurling racial epithets at young African American children, since the 1992 assault, Wahlberg has lived a clean and honest life.  As we all know, he is an actor, a producer, an entrepreneur and an active and involved philanthropist. He is the long time husband of Rhea Durham, has 4 daughters and got his GED in 2013 ( I am particularly impressed by this achievement. Certainly there was no reason other than personal growth and self improvement for this step. No doubt, Lone Survivor, Ted 2 and Entourage would have done well without Wahlberg having earned his GED).

All of his good deeds and work to better his life and and the lives of others is carefully laid out in his pardon petition which you can read here. insert petition. Take a look, it’s a good read and provides rare insight into the life of a well known celebrity.  And, as far as pardon petitions go, Wahlberg’s is solid. Persuasive. He really has changed, it seems.  And, you know what? Wahlberg did have a very difficult  early life. He was the youngest of 9 children, and, as noted above was doing drugs by age 13 and had constant run-ins with the law. Basically, nobody was watching this kid, holding him accountable, teaching him right from wrong. Does that excuse his crimes? No. Does that mean he wasn’t responsible for calling African-American kids in the neighborhood the “N-word”, chasing them on his bike and throwing rocks at them? Hell no, it doesn’t. But it does provide some context for his life and shows just how far he has come from those early days.

So, given that Wahlberg has a good, true story to tell, one that ticks off all the boxes required for the granting of a pardon, why did he not get one? That answer is more involved than one would think. The main, legal reason? Well, basically he withdrew his petition (The Parole Board sent him letters asking if wanted to keep it open but Wahlberg never responded) so there was nothing for an official to act on. The story behind that? Only Wahlberg knows the answer but it’s pretty easy to figure out.

Here’s my take:

Though the victim of his most violent act (from which the 1988 convictions stemmed), Hoa Trinh, was in favor of Wahlberg being granted a pardon many back in the old neighborhood were not. In fact, over 15,500 people signed an18MR.org (a website that  seeks to promote Asian and Pacific Islanders civic engagement, influence, and movement by leveraging the power of technology and social media) petition entitled “Don’t Pardon Mark Wahlberg’s Hate Crime Conviction.” And, over 2,500 people signed a separate petition on MoveOn.org that sought to have Wahlberg withdraw his for pardon or declined due to the violent and racially inflammatory aspects of his criminal acts. Also, once Wahlberg filed the petition, the ugly details of his troubled youth and his hateful and hate-filled behavior started appearing in both local and national media. You see, Wahlberg calling those children the “N-word” wasn’t an isolated act of hate; the 1988 crime wasn’t just a fight. Wahlberg referred to the first victim, Thanh Lam as a “Vietnam fucking shit” and as he was fleeing from Thanh and ran up to Hoa Trinh, the second victim, he put his arm around him and mockingly said: “Police coming, police coming, let me hide.”  And while in custody for hitting Thanh with a stick and punching Trinh in the eye, Wahlberg is alleged to have made numerous unsolicited racial statements about “gooks” and “slant-eyed gooks.” And those African-America children he taunted and chased while they were on a school trip? At least one of them, Kristyn Atwood, now 40 years old spoke out against Wahlberg getting a pardon “I don’t really care who he is. It doesn’t make him any exception. If you’re a racist, you’re always going to be a racist. And for him to want to erase it I just think it’s wrong,” she told The Associated Press after learning of Wahlberg’s request.  Atwood maintains that though she wasn’t seriously injured when Wahlberg threw a rock at her then fourth grade self, the incident left a lasting impression. No doubt, Kristyn. I understand that fully.

So, imagine Mark Wahlberg having spent almost 25 years trying to do the right thing, paying his debt to society on a pretty impressive scale and then when he seeks to have that change officially recognized is hammered with bad press. All the negative, immoral, criminal behavior dredged up for everyone to analyze again and again as if it just happened. I think he said to himself: No, thanks. My family, my loved ones, my god (Wahlberg is known to be a devout Catholic) knows who I am and that’s enough for me. And in the words of Cee-Lo Green said “forget you”. And so that’s it. No pardon for Mark Wahlberg.

One celebrity who was granted a pardon is Robert Downey Jr. In 2015, Governor Jerry Brown in his traditional Christmas Eve pardon announcements, included one for Downey in connection with his drug convictions from the 1990s.  Back then, Downey was a bit of a mainstay in the California court system. But when he was stopped for speeding on the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and cops found cocaine, heroin, and a weapon in his car, Downey could no longer avoid incarceration. He was sentenced to prison for violating probation for a prior drug offense. Many may remember that in court the day of the sentencing, Downey made an emotional plea begging the Malibu judge not to send him to state prison and allow him to go to rehab yet again. The judge was not having it. He sentenced Downey to 3 years (he did get credit for his 200 days in county jail), and basically told Downey that he was manipulative, had exhausted not only the court’s patience but all options for drug rehab. So, off Downey went.  There’s an excellent Vanity Fair article that details Downey’s life in prison if you want to learn what his day to day life was like on the inside—this was no country club. But, upon release, Downey committed to living a drug-free, law-abiding life and apparently even one day while again on PCH, pulled over (without police involvement!) and tossed all of his drugs into the Pacific Ocean.  From then on, he fought his demons, got clean and was rewarded for it.  Well done, Ironman.  You got help, fixed your life, and received the recognition you deserve and I don’t mean by only from the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences.  I love a happy ending.

Scroll to Top