Celeb News

Hilary Duff’s Ex-Husband Cleared of Sexual Battery Charges

We here at PROOF have loved Hilary Duff since her days on Lizzie McGuire (so adorable!). And, we are impressed by her friendly relationship with her ex, former NHL player Mike Comrie. The Younger star first started dating Comrie in 2007 and the two were married from 2010 until 2016. They have one child together, a 5 year old son, Luca.  Despite the fact that they are often seen out together and Duff has publicly praised Comrie as an amazing father, we think she has to have cringed a little lately when seeing her name in connection with him in connection with a recent accusation of sexual battery.

The allegations against Comrie stem from an incident in February when Comrie invited two women to his home; they engaged in consensual sex. According to one of the women, Comrie wanted to have anal sex with her which she did not consent to. Comrie has been under investigation by the Los Angeles Police Department since the incident. Apparently, the woman provided recordings from the night in question.  Ultimately investigators determined that they could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the sex was not consensual, despite the tape recordings and testimony from the accuser. As such, the investigation is closed and Comrie will not be facing criminal charges. Whether the woman files a civil suit seeking money damages is another question indeed. So far no word on that.

As a side note, allow us to point out that that Duff officially filed for divorce from Comrie on February 20, 2015, one day after it was widely reported that he was acting out at Beverly Hills restaurant, Mastro’s, and reportedly hitting on his waitress, and throwing money at another woman while asking her for sex. Seems like things have not been so good for Comrie since his marriage with Duff deteriorated.

Is Fame Taking a Toll on Aaron Carter?

Aaron Carter is not accepting much of anything these days. Support from his family, responsibility for his legal woes — seems like the troubled singer isn’t interested in owning any of that right now.

The 29-year-old was arrested Saturday in Georgia on suspicion of DUI and drug possession after local police received calls that an automobile was drifting all over the road and driving into the median. Aaron’s girlfriend, Madison Parker, explained in a statement that “His automobile had a new tire put on it and it went out of alignment,” hence the drifting, but he was found in possession of marijuana — which he claims to have a legal prescription for — at the time of his arrest. While the situation seems like it could be a series of unfortunate events with logical explanations, Aaron’s older brother, Backstreet Boy Nick Carter, seemed concerned for his brother’s health and publicly Tweeted the following message to him: “To my brother: I love u no matter what & if u feel the need to reach for help, I am here and willing to help you get better.”

Aaron didn’t appreciate Nick’s message, responding with a statement of his own, saying “If my own blood (Nick) truly cared about my well-being, why wouldn’t he call me directly and have a conversation instead of making this about him through a very public forum. That’s not cool at all to use me for his PR and kick me while I am down. I love my family despite it through thick and thin.” We don’t necessarily disagree with Aaron–is a social media post really the best way to express personal feelings about a family member you think is in need of help? Could be that there is continued strain in the relationship (see below), that the brothers may not be speaking and Nick thought posting was the only way to reach his brother and express his support and concern for him.

The Carters are no strangers to tragedy, however, and regardless of whether Nick’s use of Twitter to reach out was in poor taste, he has reason to be concerned about his sibling’s drug use: the brothers lost their sister Leslie in 2012, at the age of 25 to an accidental overdose of prescription drugs.

Here at PROOF, we’re well aware of the toll of child stardom can take on young celebs, and Aaron’s story is all too familiar. Aaron has been performing since the age of seven and released a debut solo album at the age of ten. By age 13 he was touring with his brother and the Backstreet Boys, and making regular appearances on Nickelodeon and the Disney Channel. His second album, entitled Aaron’s Party (Come Get It) was released in 2000 and went triple platinum. By the age of 16, he had released four albums, appeared on Broadway in Seussical the Musical, had an action figure in how own likeness, and had dated Lindsay Lohan and Hilary Duff (allegedly the same time). His family also appeared in their own reality series on E! In 2006, called House of Carters which featured all of his siblings. That’s a lot of responsibility for a teen. By 2011, Aaron entered treatment to treat undisclosed “emotional issues” as well as addiction and was devastated by the loss of sister Leslie in 2012. Since that time, he has reportedly become distant from his family, even missing brother Nick’s wedding in 2014 and Tweeting that he had “technical problems” getting there.

Aaron released an EP earlier this year. Here’s hoping he is able to get help if he needs it, make peace with his family if applicable and keep himself on a positive path.

 

 

People of the State of New York v. Harvey Weinstein Begins

With cameras and reporters contained in a pen out front of a Manhattan courthouse and more lined up in the hallway outside of the courtroom, and even more packed in the benches inside the courtroom (along with several Weinstein survivors), the trial that sparked the Me Too movement has begun. Day one was uneventful with the judge issuing some pretrial rulings regarding jury selection. The week continued with scores of jurors admitting they could not be fair and impartial and several stating they too had been victims of sexual misconduct. One potential juror even said a friend had a bad encounter with Weinstein in a hotel room (naturally she wasn’t selected).  And, on another day, Harvey Weinstein, a man who despite it all still seems to think the rules do not apply to him was admonished by the judge for using his cell phone in the courtroom.. PROOF was inside that very room and it was more than crystal clear that phones were not to be used at all. 

Jury selection is set to continue for another week–it will not be an easy task but it will get done and then the trial will start in earnest. Though, his lawyers are grabbing at every little opening they see to have the case dismissed or delayed. In fact, when news came out that sexual assault charges were being filed against Weinstein in Los Angeles, they asked that the the New York case be continued because the jury pool was being prejudiced by this new information flooding media platforms. 

Justice James Burke, the judge presiding over the New York case denied the request ruling that the LA charges were “next to meaningless” regarding the New York case. Bottom line continued Burke,  jurors were being selected through a proper jury selection process and Weinstein, like all defendants, was presumed innocent despite news coverage.

Weinstein is facing five counts of felony sex crimes: two counts of predatory sexual assault, criminal sexual act in the third degree, first-degree rape and third-degree rape. He faces life imprisonment should the jury convict him of predatory rape. 

Jane Fonda: Fire Drill Fridays

Jane Fonda is putting her money where her mouth is regarding climate change. The eighty-one year old actress moved to DC this fall so she could protest every Friday and have her voice heard on the issue. And, she didn’t give a rat’s a** if she got arrested. In fact, she expected it, arguably hoped for it so that Washington would wake up and listen.  So far, Fonda has been arrested four times while banking on her celebrity status to bring a needed sense of urgency about the climate crisis.  

One thing Fonda’s Fire Drill Fridays did bring out were other celebrities. As of this writing, Ted Danson, Sam Waterston, Amber Valetta, Diane Lane, Robert Kennedy, Jr. Catherine Keener, Rosanna Arquette, Piper Perabo, and Marg Helegenberger are some of Fonda’s famous friends who have joined her and gotten arrested while trying  to bring attention to the issue. On a fun note, Ben & Jerry’s provided free ice cream at one of the protests. Washington, you listening?

 

Mel B. Restraining Order | Celebrity News | Celeb News

Mel B Gets Restraining Order Against Husband Stephen Belafonte

In a shock to those not close to her, former Spice Girl Melanie Brown, aka Mel B, sought a restraining order against her husband, Stephen Belafonte. (In March 2017, the pop star filed for divorce from him.) In support of the request Mel B alleged that she has suffered years of physical and sexual abuse at Belafonte’s hands during their 10-year marriage. The judge granted the order as to Mel B and also ordered Belafonte to stay away from the children and to immediately leave the couple’s home in the Hollywood Hills.

The America’s Got Talent judge says that the physical abuse began soon after they were married in 2007 and right around the “Dancing With The Stars” finale in November 2007 (Mel B lost); and it has continued since then. The singer claims she tried to leave Belafonte multiple times but he told her that he would destroy her if she left. Brown has said, “I desperately wanted to leave the relationship and tried to do so during our first year of marriage and every year thereafter. When I threatened to leave, [he] informed me he has videos of our sex life and other private moments.” She continued, “[He] would threaten that if I left, he would release the videos to the tabloids. I have lived the past decade in fear that [he] would release intimate videos of me that would embarrass me and damage my reputation and my career.”  

Brown also alleges, “[He] often times demanded that I participate in sexual intercourse with him and random women that he brought back to our hotel rooms. If I objected to participating, he would threaten to release compromising videos of me. He would often times surreptitiously videotape these encounters, and, if I discovered the recordings, would beg him to delete them.”

She went on in the docs, “Later, I would come to realize that [his] beatings and abuse would coincide with my career success,” she claims. “When something good would happen to me, he would beat me down to let me know that he was in charge.”

In July 2012, Brown claims Belafonte punched her after he accused her of flirting with Usher on the “X Factor.”  She also alleges that he punched her in the face in Prague, one day after the Spice Girls reunion at the London Olympics.

In court docs, Brown also alleges that Belafonte got their nanny pregnant and that he eventually demanded her to get an abortion.

Sadly, we speak of domestic violence frequently here on PROOF and we will continue to do so as an act of solidarity and support for the victims and as a way to educate our readers. The truth is, it is scary to be in an abusive relationship and as the Mel B situation shows, it is scary to try to get out of it.  In fact, when she requested the temporary restraining order, Brown said she feared for her life and that of her children’s lives. She wrote, “I am in fear of my safety and I am in fear of being irreparably harmed as a result of [Belafonte’s] threats. I fear [he] will carry out his threats against me which will collaterally harm the children.” The former couple has one daughter together, a 5-year-old named Madison, whom she is seeking full custody of in their divorce. Brown also has two other daughters from previous relationships — Angel (her daughter with Eddie Murphy) and Phoenix.

Belafonte has denied the abuse. His lawyers issued the following public statement: “What matters most to Mr. Belafonte is the safety and well-being of his daughters and step-daughters. It’s a shame that Ms. Brown elected not to proceed in a respectful and amicable fashion in this very private matter. In due course, Mr. Belafonte will be filing his response to the outrageous and unfounded allegations made by Ms. Brown, which allegations he vehemently denies.”

So, the response Belafonte’s lawyers will file will clearly be to deny the claims. Rest assured PROOF will diligently monitor this case. But with the alleged frequency of the abuse and the public life these two lived there is very likely going to be a greal deal of evidence uncovered–people who worked with and saw Mel B’s injuries are already coming out (thank you, Sharon Osbourne). And that’s what we like best here–PROOF. The more proof. We do wonder what Belafonte has to say about those pictures of Mel B’s bruised face. She’s just clumsy?  

Seeking more celebrity news? Check out other PROOF articles.  We cover celebrity news like no one else!

New Lawsuit Alleges That Disastrous Fyre Festival Was Nothing More Than ‘Get-Rich-Quick Scam’

Last week, social media exploded with shocking photos of the doomed luxury music festival in the Bahamas known as the Fyre Festival. Organizers, rapper Ja Rule and businessman Billy McFarland, had promised a luxury festival with A-list bands like Blink 182 and Major Lazer, gourmet food, and cush accommodations, and ticket holders had paid between 1,200 and $100,000 apiece to attend.

But when attendees began arriving April 27, all they found was a gravelly field, wind-and-rain-battered FEMA-like tents and bread and cheese for dinner. By Friday morning, the festival had been canceled — and the festival goers found themselves with few options to get home quickly. Organizers had encouraged them to leave their cash at home, and use pre-loaded festival wristbands instead, so, according to the lawsuit, many had no way to get a taxi to the airport.

So how did everything go so very wrong? According to a $100 million class action lawsuit filed by celeb lawyer Mark Geragos on behalf of attendee Daniel Jung, the festival organizers, who began promoting the festival back in December 2016, failed to deliver on even the most basic of their promises, and left the attendees in a life-or-death situation.

The suit alleges, “Defendants intended to fleece attendees for hundreds of millions of dollars by inducing them to fly to a remote island without food, shelter or water — and without regard to what might happen to them after that.”

The suit claims that the atmosphere on the island was less like Coachella and more like The Hunger Games, or Lord of the Flies, and goes as far as to allege that enticing the attendees to the island without basic services and no easy way to leave was “tantamount to false imprisonment.”

Festival organizers blamed inexperience. “We were overwhelmed and just didn’t have the foresight to solve all these problems,” McFarland has reportedly said. “The reality is, we weren’t experienced enough to keep up.”

But that explanation is just not good enough, according to the lawsuit. “This outrageous failure to prepare, coupled with Defendants’ deliberate falsehoods in promoting the island ‘experience,’ demonstrates that the Fyre Festival was nothing more than a get-rich-quick scam from the very beginning.”
Ja Rule strongly denied that allegation, telling Rolling Stone, “My partners and I wanted this to be an amazing event, it was NOT A SCAM as everyone is reporting. I don’t know how everything went so [wrong] but I’m working to make it right by making sure everyone is refunded.”

Refunds are allegedly in the works, and perhaps shockingly, the festival organizers say they’re moving forward with plans to hold the festival in 2018 in a U.S. location.

I’m Sorry, Mrs. Jackson

In early February 2017, Michael Jackson’s, 86-year-old mother, Katherine Jackson, sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) against her nephew and long-time caretaker, Trent Jackson, for elder abuse. Trent had been taking care of Katherine since Michael died in 2009 and is the son of Luther Jackson, brother of Joe Jackson, Katherine’s ex-husband.

Trent vehemently denied the claims and said that the matriarch was being manipulated by her son Jermaine, as well as by her other children. Trent also claimed that the elder abuse allegations may have been made up by the children and that Katherine may not have even signed the declaration wherein she made the allegations which included: “Trent made himself a care custodian of Mrs. Jackson to control her every move. He’s threatened not to take her home for not complying with his demands, he has refused to return her home from travel; he deprives her from contact with her family so he can maintain undue influence over her, causing her depression, angst and fear.”

The documents also claimed that Trent’s actions were calculated so that he could try to control Katherine’s finances and stay in her guest house for free. The documents went on to say that the “Constant, sometimes subtle, emotional abuse was effective in making Mrs. Jackson confused and unsure of what was happening to her.”

However, according to Katherine’s legal team and family, she eventually became aware of what was happening: “She is clear now and scared for her safety, after terminating his employment. Now that he knows his conduct will be revealed, she fears what he may do to her upon her return.”

While Katherine was in London with her daughter, Janet, the court issued the TRO based on the documents filed. The TRO mandated that Trent was to return all keys, passwords and combinations to Katherine’s property, to stop using her financial accounts and to stay 100 yards from her.

Katherine was still in London when it came time for a full proceeding on the restraining order—the one that would make it permanent.  Her lawyers attempted to go forward without her and simply use the filed declarations referenced above as proof but Trent’s legal team of Philip Cohen and Ron Rale (he was Anna Nicole Smith’s attorney back in the day) was not having it. The judge agreed and said sworn statements could not be used as evidence in chief in the case. Trent’s lawyers subpoenaed Katherine for trial. She had no choice but to return from London or risk dismissal of the case.

A three week continuance ensued during which Trent’s lawyers tried to settle the matter but Katherine’s team refused to do so.  Settling might have been the better course for them as allegedly they did not want her to have to take the stand and endure cross examination. We at PROOF understand that position. Cross examination is very stressful and Katherine is not young; but the allegations made against Trent are very, very serious.  We agree with the judge’s decision to require a higher level of proof than the declarations (especially as Katherine was clear about what happened).

On April 25, 2017, Katherine’s team filed a request for dismissal with prejudice which means that the case would be dismissed but it could be re-filed at any time. There are several reasons for this strategy. It relieves Katherine from having to testify but keeps the case “alive.” So if her legal team chose to re-file, perhaps the next judge assigned would agree with their position not to require Katherine’s testimony. It also gives the team additional time to build the case and secure better, more persuasive evidence.

Trent’s legal team opposed the request for dismissal without prejudice and argued that the law required the case be dismissed with prejudice. The judge agreed. The difference between the two? Katherine Jackson cannot now re-file the case. ( Caveat: If a new instance of abuse occurs she could re-file based on that new incident but given that Trent was terminated from his job that’s not likely to occur).  We’re sorry, Mrs. Jackson.

There is one last thing we’d like to say about this case. While we certainly hope Katherine is safe and the allegations are untrue, we can’t help but query why one of her own children, rather than the son of her deceased husband’s brother was able to be in such a position of power and control for so long over their elderly mother?  Jackson kids, got an answer for that?

At PROOF there’s nothing we like to do more than to share celebrity news; and we love sharing that celebrity news with you! Browse the site and see what hits you.

 

Court of Appeals Says It’s Okay for Mayweather to Post About Ex’s Abortion

I do not like Floyd Mayweather. I do not like how he treated a woman he at one time allegedly loved nor do I like how he has treated other women with whom he has had relationships. Floyd Mayweather has a long history of violence against women. He has even served time for it though he has rather unremorsefully said that because there are no pictures of any of these abusive incidents that he should not be compared to O.J. Simpson or Chris Brown.

The topic of this post though isn’t his violence against women but rather addresses a complex legal issue involving the right to privacy and the First Amendment in a matter that went to the California Court of Appeals. It stems from a lawsuit Mayweather’s ex fiance, Shantel Jackson filed in which she sought damages after Mayweather posted on social media that the reason he broke up with her was because she had an abortion.  While Mayweather’s behavior is clearly reprehensible, it did not violate any laws, so says the Court of Appeals in its March 27, 2017, decision (to read full opinion, click here).

The court ruled that Mayweather did not violate Jackson’s privacy because their high-profile relationship was for public consumption and that the First Amendment protects the publication of truthful information. The bottom line is that celebs who date other celebs have less rights to privacy than regular folks do so basically it’s okay to abortion shame Jackson because she really did have an abortion and because both she and Mayweather were willingly in the public eye. Here in the US, we call that free speech–even if it’s hurtful, even if it’s damaging.  

Mayweather and Jackson’s relationship was far from a fairy tale. In the complaint Jackson filed back in September 2014, she shared details of a very stormy, abusive relationship. She was 21 years old, and an aspiring model when she met him; he was a well known professional boxer. The couple was constantly making up and breaking up. In January 2014, Jackson told Mayweather she had aborted their twin fetuses. He broke up with her after that. A few months later, Jackson attended a basketball game with the rapper Nelly. Jackson posted about Nelly. Mayweather then threatened to post nude images of Jackson if she didn’t take down her posts about Nelly. She refused. Mayweather took to social media and wrote, “the real reason me and Shantel Christine Jackson @MissJackson broke up was because she got an abortion, and I’m totally against killing babies. She killed our twin babies. #ShantelJackson #Floyd Mayweather #TheMoneyTeam #TMT.” Mayweather went even further and posted a sonogram of the twin fetuses. He also discussed her abortion and her cosmetic surgeries on the radio.

Mayweather’s legal team alleged that Jackson’s suit was frivolous. In keeping with California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, which helps the courts get rid of frivolous or malicious lawsuits) statute when deciding the issue, Justice Perluss, the Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven in California looked at whether or not the plaintiff’s claims come from protected activity on an issue of public interest.

Perluss wrote that it was not necessary to figure out if Mayweather’s comments about “killing babies” contributed to the public’s abortion discussion because Jackson and Mayweather “are both high profile individuals who were subject to extensive media scrutiny. As such, Mayweather’s postings and comments concerning his relationship with Jackson, as well as Jackson’s pregnancy, its termination and her cosmetic surgery, were ‘celebrity gossip’ properly considered, under established case law, as statements in connection with an issue of public interest.”

The Justice wrote, “Jackson’s pregnancy, the subsequent termination of that pregnancy — whether by abortion (which she has neither admitted nor denied) or otherwise — and her use of cosmetic surgery to enhance her appearance would, under many circumstances, be considered intensely private information; and its unwanted disclosure might well be offensive to a reasonable person.”

So for many people divulging information like whether or not you had plastic surgery or an abortion would be an invasion of privacy, but the judge went on, “Nonetheless, at a time when entertainment news and celebrity gossip often seem to matter more than serious policy discussions, given Jackson’s high profile and voluntary disclosure on social media of many aspects of her personal life, the publication of those otherwise intimate facts must necessarily be considered newsworthy under the broad definition of that term developed and applied by the Supreme Court and courts of appeal.”

That basically means if you are a celebrity or high-profile person who regularly posts personal things you can’t suddenly decide that you want privacy. If you are active on social media and share with the world personal facts, then you do not have a viable legal leg to stand on if someone posts personal facts about you–as long as they are true.  

On the whole the decision was  a big win for Mayweather, however, Perluss did make sure to say that posting the sonogram (which went viral), “served no legitimate public purpose, even when one includes entertainment news within the zone of protection” and that it was “outside the protection afforded a newsworthy report.” Posting that image went too far and is not protected.

The appellate court also addressed Mayweather’s statement that he ended his relationship with Jackson due to the abortion and whether any damage resulted from it. The court wrote, “Given that Jackson has not contested the truth of Mayweather’s declaration that she had an abortion, the statement that Mayweather ended his relationship with Jackson for that reason does not appear to be defamatory. On its face, the allegedly false part of the posts (the cause of the breakup) did not expose Jackson to contempt, ridicule or other reputational injury. Indeed, the evidence Jackson presented of negative public reaction and the emotional distress she suffered as a result of Mayweather’s May 1, 2014 posts focused on the abortion of the twin fetuses, not Mayweather’s role in, or reasons for, ending the couple’s relationship.”

The main take away from the Court’s 37 page opinion, is that celebs who date celebs and who routinely put their personal life out there for public consumption have reduced rights to privacy And, as long as what is said is true, there is no cause of action on which to base a lawsuit.

The world can now go back to pretending that Mayweather isn’t a bad guy and is just a loving dad who throws elaborate birthday parties for his 16 year old son and is known as one of “boxing’s greatest money makers.” Seems like that’s all most people care about anyway.  Shame.

At PROOF there’s nothing we like to do more than to share celebrity news; and we love sharing that celebrity news with you! Browse the site and see what hits you.

Cardi B Indicted for Strip Club Brawl

It looks like you can take the girl out of Love & Hip Hop, but you can’t take the Love & Hip Hop out of the girl. Cardi B, former Love & Hip Hop star and current hip-hop sensation (she’s even featured in Maroon 5’s mainstream hit Girls Like You) has been arrested and charged with one count of assault and two counts of reckless endangerment after an altercation between her posse and two female bartenders at a New York strip club.

Here’s how the altercation allegedly went down: Cardi B was at a strip club in Queens, NY where her husband, Offset and his group Migos, were performing. According to two bartending sisters at the club, Jade and Baddie G, Cardi B orchestrated an assault on them after hearing that they slept with Offset. Among the things thrown in the assault? Chairs, drinks, and a hookah!

 

If Cardi B and throwing stuff feels familiar that’s because it is. A few weeks before this strip club incident, Cardi B allegedly attempted to assault rapper, Nicki Minaj, at a New York Fashion Week event by throwing a shoe at her.  Many of us have viewed the footage of that incident and we can see Cardi B lunging at Minaj right before security details move in to break up the fight. Many of us have also seen images of Cardi B leaving the event without a shoe. So . . . Well, in any event, no arrests have been made or charges brought as a result of the Fashion Week incident. Minaj however took to the airwaves soon after denying that she said anything negative about Cardi B and her mothering skills (allegedly that was what prompted the shoe throwing) and described the incident as humiliating.

Though the facts aren’t totally clear, what’s different about the strip club attack from the Fashion Week attack is that the crux of the allegations aren’t that Cardi B threw anything but rather she directed her posse to do so.

Shielded by umbrellas and surrounded by her team, Cardi B (who clearly got dressed up for the event) surrendered at a Queen’s police precinct on Monday, October 1st. The singer will be arraigned on October 29th.

 

 

Dean McDermott and Family | Celebrity News

Dean McDermott Not Paying Child Support?

Dean McDermott, husband of Tori Spelling and father of their four (soon to be five) children, has not been making child support payments says Mary Jo Eustace, his ex-wife and mother of their son, Jack

If you’re already not a big McDermott fan because of all that affair drama (among other things!) with Spelling, this article isn’t going to make you like him any more. Basically his ex wife is saying he’s a dead-beat dad who doesn’t keep his word nor abide by a court order. Eustace filed an order to show cause and an affidavit for contempt on January 25, 2017 in Los Angeles seeking to force McDermott to make the payments, which are to the tune of $100K.

In the document, Eustace, who was married to McDermott from 1993-2006 (that’s kind of a long time!), claimed that months ago her ex simply stopped paying child support and alimony for their now 18-year-old son, Jack. As she indicated in the court documents, “The respondent just stopped paying. He is working and lives in a $2 million dollar rental.”

In the documents, Eustace further states: “Order was entered mid September. He stopped paying in November. Also for two years prior, he did not pay and I renegotiated in good faith moving forward in our new stipulation.” Clearly Eustace, a Canadian singer/chef has had enough of this alleged non payment. She  wants the 100k in monthly installments until July 1, 2020. McDermott has been ordered to appear in court on March 9 to address these allegations. What’s interesting about an Order to Show Cause and an Affidavit for Contempt that Eustace filed is that a contempt proceeding is criminal in nature which means that if the court finds McDermott to be in contempt of a prior court order or executed agreement, penalties could include jail, a community service, and fines in addition to fulfilling the payments mandated by the underlying Order. Eustace is not playing around this time.  I am sure when she saw the images of the uber-fancy baby shower for McDermott’s fifth child with Spelling, she was glad she filed those court docs. Yes, we know the rumor mill was swirling that McDermott and Spelling’s pricey baby shower was what prompted Eustace to go to court. Sorry to burst your bubbles, Eustace filed the court docs two weeks before that luxe baby bash on February 11.

McDermott seems to have an  issue with debts-paying them that is. He and Spelling owe almost a million dollars in back taxes and have hundreds of thousands of unpaid credit card bills.  Let’s hope a judge rules soon and Eustace, and her son, can get the money they are owed. No doubt when Eustace goes to bed at night, she’s glad McDermott is not beside her.

Interested in learning more celebrity news? Please peruse PROOF. We have tons of celebrity news articles about your Hollywood favorites.

Oscar De La Hoya Alcohol Troubles | Celebrity News | Proof With Jill Stanley

Arrest: Oscar De La Hoya Troubles with Alcohol Resurface

Former world champion boxer Oscar De La Hoya was arrested Wednesday, January 25, 2017 in Pasadena, California for driving under the influence. California Highway Patrol  (yep, that’s CHiPS for all of you who remember the television show from the late 70s/early 80s with Erik Estrada) saw him speeding on Del Mar Boulevard in the early morning hours and pulled him over.  Officers performed field-sobriety tests; De La Hoya failed and was arrested (he was later released into the custody of his manager). The legal limit in California, as in most states, is .08%, and according to local law enforcement, De La Hoya was over that.

This arrest is particularly sad for the 43 year old boxer who been battling drug and alcohol addiction for years. Back in 2011 De La Hoya spoke publicly about his addiction, the fact, that he first started drinking at 9 years old at family gatherings in East Los Angeles. He also spoke of the role addiction played in the incredibly embarrassing incident from 2007 in which he was photographed in a hotel with another woman (not his wife), dressed in high heels, fishnets and lingerie.  When those photos became public, De La Hoya vehemently argued that they were fake. And due to his Golden Boy image, most believed him—it was hard for anyone to imagine this good looking, successful, boxing champ doing such a thing. But in 2011, De La Hoya admitted the photos were real and that the incident was fueled by his addiction to alcohol and cocaine.  In that very candid interview, De La Hoya said that his addiction and this incident had him feeling so low that he considered suicide.  Think about that. This world famous, successful boxer struggling so much that he wants to leave the world—leave his kids, his wife, alter his legacy forever.

And as for the woman in those cross dressing photos? Well, Milana Dravnel, a stripper, claimed to have had a year long extramarital affair with De La Hoya and said that De La Hoya was in fact in those images and that he willingly engaged in the incident. So what she’d do? Did she kiss her lover goodbye and wish him well? Nope. She sued him. She said he defamed her by telling the world the photos were fake when she was telling the world they were real. She also alleged that not only did De La Hoya’s team force her to recant her statements that the photos were real but they made her sign a legal document that prohibited her from selling the photos further (She had already sold them once and had done an interview about them on Entertainment Tonight).  De La Hoya settled the matter out of court, allegedly for $20 million.  Boy, did he pick the wrong woman to mess with.

To me, and to many others, it was almost amazing to consider that this icon, this American boxer who won gold at the 1992 Barcelona Olympics (hence the nickname), this media darling, this father, husband, and role model to many, fell so low. But De La Hoya’s story shines a light on the power of addiction, the way it can devastate lives. It proves that money, success, influence does not make you immune. And for many years, up until this new arrest, there was a bright side for De la Hoya. Though he retired from boxing in 2009, in 2011 he got treatment for his addiction, worked hard to get his life back together, and seemingly had done so. That is what makes this recent arrest so sad. Let’s hope it’s not a sign of a deeper problem for the former champ.  And, if it is, let’s hope he has the ability and the will to get back up again and fight.

Bad Celebrity Motorcycle Accidents | Keanu Reeves | celebrity news

10 of the Worst Celebrity Motorcycle Accidents

Riding a motorcycle is not a joke — if you crash on a bike, severe injury or death often occurs. Naturally, being a celebrity doesn’t make one immune from these risks. Lawsuits involving what some in the medical field refer to as donor cycles abound and though very often it is not the motorcyclist who is at fault they are the ones who suffer the most serious of injuries. Below we review 10 of the worst celebrity motorcycle crashes to date.

Lauren Hutton

Model and actress Lauren Hutton was riding with a squad, which included Dennis Hopper and Jeremy Irons, near Las Vegas for a charity ride supporting the Hermitage-Guggenheim Museum in October 2001. She went down during the ride in a crash that caused her to break both legs and arms, crushed three ribs, and punctured a lung. Maybe it was a good thing she was unconscious so she didn’t feel all the pain or notice the bone protruding from her leg.

Lucky for her and a good reason to ride with friends because that day both Hopper and Irons encouraged her to wear protective gear like leathers and a full-face helmet. Those may have saved her life but one thing is for sure, they definitely saved her famous face!

Gary Busey

Gary Busey has been known to be pretty unruly for a while now. Could it be due to a coma-inducing motorcycle accident back in 1988? Though the actor was known to be a skilled and avid rider he was also anti-helmet.  So when he went down in that accident that day, he naturally wasn’t wearing one.  He fractured his skull and sustained head injuries that required several hours of neurosurgery. Busey’s doctors said that his injuries might cause permanent brain damage. In fact, when Busey was on Celebrity Rehab in 2008, psychiatrist Dr. Charles Sophy said that the the brain injury had essentially resulted in “weakening Busey’s mental filters.” Perhaps that explains it . .  .

Peter Fonda

“Easy Rider” star Peter Fonda is a man who loves motorcycles so it’s not surprising that he has had more than one accident. In 1964, the wild man decided to wear nothing but a bathing suit and loafers for a ride on his Triumph. He hit a speed bump and went down. He suffered pretty serious injuries including bruises and broken bones but he recovered.  In 1985, he got into another wreck. This time the injuries were more severe–he broke his neck and back, causing him to lose a half inch of height after surgeries.  That didn’t stop the not-so-easy rider. In 1993, he had a head on collision with a deer, which did actually have some affect on his conduct. He says that accident stopped him riding after dark and without all his gear on. Better late than never!

Keanu Reeves

Keanu Reeves, a big fan of British motorcycles, broke his ankle while riding his bike near his Beverly Hills home back in 1996. He was on crutches for months after the crash. And, it wasn’t his first bike related accident. In 1988, Reeves, who is known as a risk taker, rode his bike on a twisting canyon road with the lights off. He crashed but didn’t suffer  injury. PROOF is very familiar with these canyon roads, especially the ones in Malibu. There are always motorcycles on them- we can definitely see the appeal but even in a car during the day these roads can sometimes be pretty intimidating.

Ben Roethlisberger

Former Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger almost died when he was involved in a his motorcycle accident near downtown Pittsburgh back in 2006. The Super Bowl champ may be a great playmaker but he wasn’t so smart that day: he was riding without a valid license (he only had a learner’s permit) and he wasn’t wearing a helmet. Big Ben took a big risk that day with his life and his career. Not that money was an issue for Roethlisberger at the time of the accident but perhaps he was smarter about insurance than he was about protective gear.

Billy Idol

In 1990, rocker Billy Idol learned that not all rules can be broken when he crashed his motorcycle into a car after he ran a stop sign in Los Angeles. His leg was mangled so badly that it almost had to be amputated. A steel rod was put in place and though he had to spend more than six months in bed after the crash, he has been seen riding since that accident.

Erik Estrada

“CHiPs” actor Erik Estrada learned how to ride a motorcycle for his famous television show and once he got the hang out of it he clearly enjoyed being a two-wheeler. But back in 1980, he had a serious crash on set. Estrada was following a camera car down an alley in Pacoima, CA, and lost control of his bike. He was thrown onto the hood of the car and his bike landed on him while 75 members of the cast and crew watched. His injuries included broken ribs and a collapsed lung. Producers wrote the crash into the storyline, filming his character’s scenes from his real-life hospital bed. And, despite the severity of the crash and his injuries, he was back on set and on a bike pretty soon!

Duane Allman

Allman Brothers rock guitarists Duane Allman died after a motorcycle accident in 1971 when swerved to avoid a truck and went down. The guitarist was riding his Harley-Davidson Sportster in Macon, GA and reportedly slowed to let a flatbed truck make a left-hand turn in front of him. Apparently, Allman swerved toward the center of the road to swing around the outside of the truck, but the truck suddenly stopped and Allman ran into it and that knocked him off his motorcycle, which bounced up in the air and off of Allman’s chest before skidding to a stop along the curb. Interestingly though Allman did not die instantly; he died later that day in surgery.

David Hasselhoff

The former “Baywatch” star crashed his motorcycle in Los Angeles in 2003, resulting in not-so serious in injuries to him but very serious injuries to his passenger, his then-wife Pamela Bach,. Hasselhoff told investigating officers that he and his wife were riding his 2003 Harley-Davidson near a freeway overpass when a gust of wind forced him to lose control of the bike, which made him run into a curb, throwing the couple. It should be noted that Pamela Bach sites that accident as the turning point in her marriage when she felt she could no longer cover up her husband’s problem with alcohol. Lucky for her she can’t remember anything about the crash (or if Hasselhoff was drunk at the time) except waking up in hospital. Pamela remained in hospital for two months, had 17 operations which has left her with two steel rods and 27 screws in her left leg. FYI, the couple has been divorced since 2006.

Ann-Margaret

Ann-Margaret is a long time motorcycle lover. She was thrown from her motorcycle in Brainerd, Minnesota in August of 2000. She suffered three broken ribs and a fractured left shoulder but amazingly enough, the next day, the “Bye, Bye Birdie” star managed to still appear as the Grand Marshal of the Colonel’s Truck Accessories National Hot Rod Association Nationals, riding in a pace car with her left arm in a sling. The show must goes on, I guess!

Lots of morals to motorcycle accident stories but the biggest one–wear protective gear!

Mel Gibson

Mel Gibson is Staging His Comeback Years After Case Involving Anti-Semitic Rant Was Dismissed

The conviction connected with the anti-Semitic rant heard ‘round the world is off the record books. In fact, it has been for quite some time—since 2009. How is that most of us don’t know that? Well, it’s due to the perfectly legal concept of expungement (and a little bit because of the First Amendment). Let’s go back to 2006 when it all went down.  

Mel had a little too much to drink on July 28, 2006 (At the time, Mel was a self-pronounced, long-suffering alcoholic) at a popular bar on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu. Nevertheless, he got into the driver’s seat of his Lexus and proceeded to speed down the PCH doing 85 in a 45. I am very familiar with this stretch of road and I can tell you that he put his life, and the lives of others, in danger that night.

Once the officer pulled Mel over, it was very obvious that Mel was drunk.  The officer had Mel perform field sobriety tests and when he advised him that he was detaining him for suspicion of drunk driving that’s when all hell broke loose. Mel refused to get in the cop car, tried to run back to his own car, touted his celebrity status and “who he was”, and launched into the infamous anti-Semitic tirade that we all seem not to be able to forget. Mel was ultimately charged with misdemeanor drunk driving, driving with an elevated blood-alcohol level (his was .12 the legal limit in CA is .08) and driving with an open container of alcohol in his car (a bottle of tequila was found in the Lexus). Mel never appeared in court on the matter.  His lawyer brokered a deal, and, on Mel’s behalf, entered a plea of no contest to driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.08 percent or higher; the other charges were dropped as part of the deal. Just so my PROOF readers are clear, in California, no contest is not an admission of guilt but is equivalent to a guilty plea for the purposes of sentencing. It is not an uncommon plea in situations involving the types of charges levied against Mel Gibson.

As for his nolo plea (that’s fancy legal talk for a no contest plea which comes from the Latin phrase nolo contendere), Mel was sentenced to three years probation with a requirement that he spend the next year in a 12-step program for alcoholism, pay more than $1,600 in fines and fees, restriction of his driver’s license for 90 days, and to undergo a state-mandated alcohol abuse education program for three months.

In 2009, that conviction was expunged or dismissed, as it is called in California.  In plain language this means that the conviction is off of Mel’s record; it’s as if it never happened (though it is visible to law enforcement and can be considered should he have a subsequent arrest). Well, why is that? Did he get special treatment because he’s a celebrity (On a related note, some believe Mel got special treatment during the arrest but an investigation found that procedures were properly followed)? No, as for the dismissal, Mel did not receive special treatment. But before, I explain why he didn’t get special celeb treatment, let’s discuss briefly the concept of expungement.  Expungement is an essential part of our criminal justice system. There are many reasons why someone would seek to have a conviction expunged. Those reasons range from the inability to rent an apartment or an office, the inability to get a job, and today’s world, it might even mean the inability to get a date. Landlords and employers routinely do criminal background checks on potential tenants and candidates and, with such easy access to criminal records via the internet potential dates are now doing the same for potential mates!  So rather than have to live with the stigma of a conviction and/or have to explain sensitive situations from one’s past, if one meets the eligibility requirements, an expungement can be very helpful.

Expungement eligibility varies by state but the requirements are generally similar and by analyzing Mel’s dismissal we can learn how the convictions of others might be handled.  Here’s what the judge in 2009 considered when dismissing Mel’s case:

  1. Mel was convicted of a misdemeanor
  2. Mel was not sentenced to time in prison
  3. Mel satisfied all the requirement of his punishment
  4. Mel had not gotten into any other legal trouble ( He was arrested 2 years later though!)
  5. More than a year had passed since Mel’s conviction

Thankfully no one was physically injured as a result of Mel’s drunk driving. The most heinous part of Mel’s arrest, to most of us, is those terrible, hateful comments that spewed from his mouth that night.  And for those who believe alcohol is a truth serum it is very hard to forgot what he said or believe that he did not mean what he said despite his apologies.  But, Mel did not violate any laws by saying what he said. The First Amendment, protects his words no matter how odious or hurtful and so you will notice that Mel’s comments are not part of the dismissal discussion. Quite simply, they play no role in the expungement analysis. No matter how bothered some may still be by his comments, the judge’s actions in not considering them in his dismissal determination, was proper.  As for whether you forgive or dismiss from your mind Mel’s arrest, well, that’s solely for you to decide.

Darius McCrary in domestic violence dispute | celebrity news | PROOF with Jill Stanley

Actor Darius McCrary is Facing Some Serious Family Matters

Darius McCrary, you may remember his as “Eddie” from “Family Matters,” and his estranged wife, Tammy Brawner, are embroiled in a bitter domestic violence dispute with both sides claiming violence against the other.

In shocking allegations, Brawner asked for a restraining order against her McCrary on February 10, 2017 claiming that the one-time sitcom star held their one-year-old daughter, Zoey, over a pot of boiling water and saying he wished she had never been born. She says he threw objects at her (Brawner) that almost hit Zoey. Brawner claimed that the actor has been abusive for years, coming home drunk and on drugs, and striking her during violent outbursts.

After hearing the claims, a judge granted Brawner, who was once a Harlem Globetrotter, a restraining order.  McCrary didn’t let things end there. He made several digs about his ex on social media calling her a “failed gold digger baller” but in a very interesting turn of events, he sought a restraining order against Brawner saying that she’s  the one who is abusive to him. Among his claims? She threw an iron at him.  A judge granted McCrary’s request for a temporary restraining order. Now they both have one! Not easy to parent when dual orders are in place!

By the way, this isn’t McCrary’s first family related claim.  A prior ex, Karrine Steffans, accused McCrary of domestic violence and child abuse. Steffans said that she saw McCrary beat his son with a spoon.  McCrary has also been arrested for failing to pay child support.

This is one very complex family matter! Let’s hope Zoey, the couple’s daughter, is spared as much as possible and can grow up in a healthy, loving, nonviolent home.

Mark Wahlberg Isn’t About to Get a Pardon, But Check Out the Celeb Who Did

Pardon, the governmental act that bestows official forgiveness upon someone convicted of a crime is an important aspect of the American justice system. Getting a pardon doesn’t mean one is innocent or that the crime did not occur; but it does mean one can get some rights back, such as the right to vote, sit on a jury or hold office (I know what some of you are thinking, who cares about any of that? I would love an excuse to get out of jury duty!).  But, to the convicted felon a pardon is important and often has more to do with actually feeling forgiven and reducing the stigma associated with being a convict than anything else.

Mark Wahlberg comes to mind for many of us when we think of celebrities and pardons.  And there’s good reason for that. In November 2014, he petitioned the governor of Massachusetts for a pardon for his 1988 convictions for criminal contempt, assault and battery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, and possession of a class D controlled substance.  He was not yet 17 at the time of the convictions but was treated as an adult in the eyes of the law. He was sentenced to 2 years in prison (He only served 45 days; the rest was suspended). After being released he went on to become a pretty well known rapper—Marky Mark.  You would have thought he would have learned his lesson but, no, in 1992, he had another fight. This time he fractured someone’s jaw. Ultimately, Wahlberg did not face criminal charges for that incident but rather settled the matter in the civil arena. Putting those two violent incidents aside as well all the other issues that defined his very troubled youth, such as extensive drug use and hurling racial epithets at young African American children, since the 1992 assault, Wahlberg has lived a clean and honest life.  As we all know, he is an actor, a producer, an entrepreneur and an active and involved philanthropist. He is the long time husband of Rhea Durham, has 4 daughters and got his GED in 2013 ( I am particularly impressed by this achievement. Certainly there was no reason other than personal growth and self improvement for this step. No doubt, Lone Survivor, Ted 2 and Entourage would have done well without Wahlberg having earned his GED).

All of his good deeds and work to better his life and and the lives of others is carefully laid out in his pardon petition which you can read here. insert petition. Take a look, it’s a good read and provides rare insight into the life of a well known celebrity.  And, as far as pardon petitions go, Wahlberg’s is solid. Persuasive. He really has changed, it seems.  And, you know what? Wahlberg did have a very difficult  early life. He was the youngest of 9 children, and, as noted above was doing drugs by age 13 and had constant run-ins with the law. Basically, nobody was watching this kid, holding him accountable, teaching him right from wrong. Does that excuse his crimes? No. Does that mean he wasn’t responsible for calling African-American kids in the neighborhood the “N-word”, chasing them on his bike and throwing rocks at them? Hell no, it doesn’t. But it does provide some context for his life and shows just how far he has come from those early days.

So, given that Wahlberg has a good, true story to tell, one that ticks off all the boxes required for the granting of a pardon, why did he not get one? That answer is more involved than one would think. The main, legal reason? Well, basically he withdrew his petition (The Parole Board sent him letters asking if wanted to keep it open but Wahlberg never responded) so there was nothing for an official to act on. The story behind that? Only Wahlberg knows the answer but it’s pretty easy to figure out.

Here’s my take:

Though the victim of his most violent act (from which the 1988 convictions stemmed), Hoa Trinh, was in favor of Wahlberg being granted a pardon many back in the old neighborhood were not. In fact, over 15,500 people signed an18MR.org (a website that  seeks to promote Asian and Pacific Islanders civic engagement, influence, and movement by leveraging the power of technology and social media) petition entitled “Don’t Pardon Mark Wahlberg’s Hate Crime Conviction.” And, over 2,500 people signed a separate petition on MoveOn.org that sought to have Wahlberg withdraw his for pardon or declined due to the violent and racially inflammatory aspects of his criminal acts. Also, once Wahlberg filed the petition, the ugly details of his troubled youth and his hateful and hate-filled behavior started appearing in both local and national media. You see, Wahlberg calling those children the “N-word” wasn’t an isolated act of hate; the 1988 crime wasn’t just a fight. Wahlberg referred to the first victim, Thanh Lam as a “Vietnam fucking shit” and as he was fleeing from Thanh and ran up to Hoa Trinh, the second victim, he put his arm around him and mockingly said: “Police coming, police coming, let me hide.”  And while in custody for hitting Thanh with a stick and punching Trinh in the eye, Wahlberg is alleged to have made numerous unsolicited racial statements about “gooks” and “slant-eyed gooks.” And those African-America children he taunted and chased while they were on a school trip? At least one of them, Kristyn Atwood, now 40 years old spoke out against Wahlberg getting a pardon “I don’t really care who he is. It doesn’t make him any exception. If you’re a racist, you’re always going to be a racist. And for him to want to erase it I just think it’s wrong,” she told The Associated Press after learning of Wahlberg’s request.  Atwood maintains that though she wasn’t seriously injured when Wahlberg threw a rock at her then fourth grade self, the incident left a lasting impression. No doubt, Kristyn. I understand that fully.

So, imagine Mark Wahlberg having spent almost 25 years trying to do the right thing, paying his debt to society on a pretty impressive scale and then when he seeks to have that change officially recognized is hammered with bad press. All the negative, immoral, criminal behavior dredged up for everyone to analyze again and again as if it just happened. I think he said to himself: No, thanks. My family, my loved ones, my god (Wahlberg is known to be a devout Catholic) knows who I am and that’s enough for me. And in the words of Cee-Lo Green said “forget you”. And so that’s it. No pardon for Mark Wahlberg.

One celebrity who was granted a pardon is Robert Downey Jr. In 2015, Governor Jerry Brown in his traditional Christmas Eve pardon announcements, included one for Downey in connection with his drug convictions from the 1990s.  Back then, Downey was a bit of a mainstay in the California court system. But when he was stopped for speeding on the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and cops found cocaine, heroin, and a weapon in his car, Downey could no longer avoid incarceration. He was sentenced to prison for violating probation for a prior drug offense. Many may remember that in court the day of the sentencing, Downey made an emotional plea begging the Malibu judge not to send him to state prison and allow him to go to rehab yet again. The judge was not having it. He sentenced Downey to 3 years (he did get credit for his 200 days in county jail), and basically told Downey that he was manipulative, had exhausted not only the court’s patience but all options for drug rehab. So, off Downey went.  There’s an excellent Vanity Fair article that details Downey’s life in prison if you want to learn what his day to day life was like on the inside—this was no country club. But, upon release, Downey committed to living a drug-free, law-abiding life and apparently even one day while again on PCH, pulled over (without police involvement!) and tossed all of his drugs into the Pacific Ocean.  From then on, he fought his demons, got clean and was rewarded for it.  Well done, Ironman.  You got help, fixed your life, and received the recognition you deserve and I don’t mean by only from the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences.  I love a happy ending.

Scroll to Top